https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68338
Teles changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68338
Teles changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://pt.wikipedia.org/wi
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68338
Helder changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||shell
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68338
Andre Klapper changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Low
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68338
--- Comment #2 from Andre Klapper ---
Personally I wonder how adding this group solves any problems, instead of
creating the same level of problems by discussing how to somehow identify a
person as good faith editor.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68338
--- Comment #3 from Teles ---
I wasn't clear when I said "somehow", but that can't be a problem as it is
already discussed.
The criteria is subjective most of the times. A new user that makes only
wikitext errors, an user that is subscribed t
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68338
--- Comment #4 from Bartosz Dziewoński ---
Wouldn't it be simpler to identify such users by checking whether they are
blocked? ;)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68338
Dereckson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|shell |community-consensus-needed
Sta
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68338
--- Comment #6 from Teles ---
(In reply to Bartosz Dziewoński from comment #4)
> Wouldn't it be simpler to identify such users by checking whether they are
> blocked? ;)
I am sorry for I don't understand your point. This group is intended to i
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68338
rschen7754.w...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rschen7754.w...@gmail.com
-
10 matches
Mail list logo
