https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
--- Comment #39 from Erik Moeller ---
OK. Most licenses do give us some leeway in terms of "reasonableness" of how
attribution requirements are met in practice. There's been lots of discussion
about this especially recently with regard to deskt
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
Erik Moeller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@wikimedia.org
--- Comment #36 from
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
Florian changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
--- Comment #35 from Gerrit Notification Bot ---
Change 155792 merged by jenkins-bot:
Adding attribution information to mobile media viewer
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/155792
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee fo
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
--- Comment #34 from Ryan Kaldari ---
Pete: I'd be happy to discuss process issues, but not inside this bug. FWIW, I
don't think there was any overlap between the people involved in bug 42660
(Kenan, Jon, MaxSem) and the people involved in the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
--- Comment #33 from Gerrit Notification Bot ---
Change 155792 had a related patch set uploaded by Kaldari:
Adding attribution information to mobile media viewer
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/155792
--
You are receiving this mail because:
Y
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
Gerrit Notification Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |PATCH_TO_REVIEW
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
--- Comment #32 from Pete F ---
(In reply to Tisza Gergő from comment #4)
> (In reply to Robert Myers from comment #3)
> > It is a CC violation, it fails to attribute the author with the licence.
>
> You need to click on the "details" link to
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
--- Comment #31 from Florian ---
> I don't understand what you're saying -- if the way to interpret a legally
> binding contract correctly isn't a "real legal issue," then what is?
maybe you read comment 4 and comment 6 again :)
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
--- Comment #30 from Pete F ---
(In reply to Florian from comment #29)
> This issue, if i read and remember correctly, isn't a real legal issue, it
> relies on how to interpret the CC correct.
I don't understand what you're saying -- if the wa
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
--- Comment #29 from Florian ---
Sorry Pete F, i still don't understand :/
> to avoid similar mistakes
This issue, if i read and remember correctly, isn't a real legal issue, it
relies on how to interpret the CC correct. And if i read correct,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
--- Comment #28 from Bingle ---
Prioritization and scheduling of this bug is tracked on Trello card
https://trello.com/c/QohbVoc2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69656
Mark Holmquist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Lack of attribution in |Lack of attribution in
13 matches
Mail list logo