https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42164
Romaine changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||53570
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
Romaine changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||42164
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #1 from Romaine ---
PS: It is fine to have somewhere a page to show the last 50 images, but
absolutely not there.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53568
Gabriel Wicke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Parsoid: Attributes are |Automatically switch from
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53568
Gabriel Wicke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |High
Severity|critical
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53538
--- Comment #7 from Chris Steipp ---
It will go out with wmf16, on Sept 5th, unless we push it out early. I could
also add a check for the old cookie name.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
Matthew Flaschen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bawolff...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
Romaine changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Immediate
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
Erik Moeller changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Immediate |Unprioritized
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53571
Web browser: ---
Bug ID: 53571
Summary: Parsoid adds ... when a single
apostrophe follows a link in a bold or italic sentence
Product: Parsoid
Version: unspecified
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53498
--- Comment #5 from T. H. Kelly (Pink&) ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I agree, it doesn't seem like CentralAuth could do this, but it does only
> happen on autocreates, which is done by CentralAuth.
Well, no, not just autocreates. While my ac
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
Yuvi Panda changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yuvipa...@gmail.com
--- Comment #3 from Y
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50474
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kwwilli...@kwwilliams.com
--- Commen
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52478
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #4 from Romaine ---
Roughly the same amount of users have access to it as last year, admins and a
special user group can edit. This caused us a lot of trouble last year.
The organizational team decided that we want to have a histor
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #5 from Yuvi Panda ---
Working link:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Yuvipanda/Campaigns_namespace_proposal
I disagree on Campaign: namespace pages being 'technical' pages. The whole
point of the namespace has been to make it e
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49686
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53553
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Schwen ---
The file is gone now. Rillke succeeded!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibu
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53565
--- Comment #2 from Yuvi Panda ---
See bug 30728, where this was initially reported, and then fixed. Looks like
the Commons gadget(?) now re-did everything, and re-introduced the original bug
:)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51897
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||53356
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53356
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||51897
--
You are receiving this mai
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50474
--- Comment #21 from kwwilli...@kwwilliams.com ---
Describing a widely used template as a "hack" and refusing to fix the bugs
associated with VE in terms of editing it is not a valid solution. The template
does work and the references work fine
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43331
Rob Lanphier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia. |bda...@wikimedia.org
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52478
--- Comment #2 from kwwilli...@kwwilliams.com ---
That response is beyond the pale. Please retract it, and concentrate on
building an editor that functions within the environment that exists, not the
environment that you wish existed.
--
You a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #6 from Romaine ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Admins can edit protected pages... protection is useless.
Between an edit and the discovery there can be a whole night in between, with
thousands of pictures uploaded in the mean time th
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #7 from Yuvi Panda ---
To repeat what I had said previously on IRC - all of Romaine's points make
perfect sense... in the older implementation of UploadCampaigns. There was no
history, no rollback, no watchlist, nothing. If someone
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53243
Gabriel Wicke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53468
Gabriel Wicke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52937
Gabriel Wicke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|High|Normal
Summary|Add DOM form
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52937
Gabriel Wicke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|PATCH_TO_REVIEW |NEW
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
Steven Walling changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||swall...@wikimedia.org
--- Comment #8
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43331
--- Comment #3 from Aaron Schulz ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> WikiFilePage calls $this->mFile->upgradeRow() in doPurge(), which is wildly
> inappropriate in this case. Maybe something like the 'forRefresh' flag for
> thumbnail purging can als
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #9 from Romaine ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Working link:
> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Yuvipanda/Campaigns_namespace_proposal
>
> I disagree on Campaign: namespace pages being 'technical' pages. The whole
> point of the
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #10 from Yuvi Panda ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> You can sure link to a page you created, but we haven't reviewed it or we
> haven't read in the text. It hasn't been discussed and are only now
> confronted
> with it. If we had see
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #11 from Romaine ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> To repeat what I had said previously on IRC - all of Romaine's points make
> perfect sense... in the older implementation of UploadCampaigns. There was no
> history, no rollback, no wa
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51232
--- Comment #10 from Calak ---
Thanks a lot.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mailing list
Wikibugs-l@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wiki
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #12 from Romaine ---
> It sounds to me like the problem had to do with changing of the campaign
> settings in a way that was not transparent and accountable. Putting the
> configuration for a campaign into a wiki page largely solves
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53498
--- Comment #6 from Brad Jorsch ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > I agree, it doesn't seem like CentralAuth could do this, but it does only
> > happen on autocreates, which is done by CentralAuth.
>
> Well, no, not ju
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50474
--- Comment #22 from James Forrester ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> Describing a widely used template as a "hack" and refusing to fix the bugs
> associated with VE in terms of editing it is not a valid solution.
Who said I was refusing to fix
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53538
--- Comment #8 from Seb35 ---
If the old cookie is kept it will be until the end of September (4-5 WMF
deployments) before natural expiration, and the code for the old cookie will
become useless. Perhaps it is better to keep the old cookie to m
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53565
Matthew Flaschen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mflasc...@wikimedia.org
--- Comment
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53553
Aaron Schulz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aschulz4...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 fr
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50474
--- Comment #23 from kwwilli...@kwwilliams.com ---
There's no way to code a single template that generates both a reference and
table markup without using {{#tag:ref}}.
If you didn't think "any reference created by a template shouldn't work,
d
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #13 from Romaine ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Err, this was posted to village pump on commons, to the commons mailing list
> and to the WLM list.
What I have read there is an update of the upload campaigns to a new system
with
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50474
--- Comment #24 from Gabriel Wicke ---
We might actually be able to use the same CSS technique I developed for
auto-numbered external links in bug 53505 for citations. That would at least
fix the numbering without extra effort, but won't help w
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #14 from Steven Walling ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> > It sounds to me like the problem had to do with changing of the campaign
> > settings in a way that was not transparent and accountable. Putting the
> > configuration for a c
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50474
--- Comment #25 from James Forrester ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> There's no way to code a single template that generates both a reference and
> table markup without using {{#tag:ref}}.
True. This should have given you pause to consider /w
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52300
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53486
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53486
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50474
--- Comment #26 from James Forrester ---
*** Bug 53486 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
Wikibugs-l mail
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53387
--- Comment #4 from MZMcBride ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> And that's why I'm suggesting humans explicitly write "Fixes-Bug" in their
> commit message, when applicable.
Right. I understand the function and utility of the proposed keyword.
>
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53324
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alolita.sha...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #15 from Yuvi Panda ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Admins can edit protected pages...
> Who caused the problems in 2012: admins + users with the right to edit the
> campaigns.
What problems, exactly? Do you have links to mailing l
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
Yuvi Panda changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Please do not add gallery |Please do not add gallery
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #16 from Yuvi Panda ---
Changed title to remove the word 'technical'. Less loaded this way, I think?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53387
--- Comment #5 from James Forrester ---
The primary use case is for bug reporters, not developers: gerrit-bot being
able to tell you that code that /fixes/ the bug has been pushed to gerrit (or
merged) is much more interesting that "some relate
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53387
--- Comment #6 from Matthew Flaschen ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I see this as a design issue, though. With the introduction of a second
> bug-related keyword, the immediate question becomes: which do I use? Do I use
> both? Do I use just on
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53434
Roan Kattouw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roan.katt...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 f
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #17 from Romaine ---
It has nothing to do with agreeing with other admins/etc or not. Those other
admins aren't aware of the detailed plan we are following and they have changed
things as they do not know what the plan is. There is
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53387
--- Comment #7 from MZMcBride ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> The primary use case is for bug reporters, not developers: gerrit-bot being
> able to tell you that code that /fixes/ the bug has been pushed to gerrit (or
> merged) is much more inte
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
Romaine changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Please do not add gallery |Please do not add gallery
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #18 from Romaine ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Changed title to remove the word 'technical'. Less loaded this way, I think?
Absolutely not. You caused already this communication problem, because you were
unclear what you meant in
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53434
--- Comment #3 from Gabriel Wicke ---
Minor nitpick: it would be null. But otherwise Roan's hunch sounds very
plausible to me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #19 from Romaine ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #12)
> > Admins can edit protected pages...
> > Who caused the problems in 2012: admins + users with the right to edit the
> > campaigns.
>
> What problems, exac
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
Web browser: ---
Bug ID: 53572
Summary: VisualEditor: Unexpected editing behaviour for
Malayalam Text
Product: VisualEditor
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53434
--- Comment #4 from James Forrester ---
This (or a closely-related bug) are really badly breaking normal editing in VE,
which we thought we had fixed with bug 52228 - namely, making multiple
sequential references.
Minimum spanning test:
Input
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #20 from Yuvi Panda ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> The whole navigational structure we have built the previous years and this
> year
> is that participants visit our website, list on Commons or list on Wikipedia,
> click there dire
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52228
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53050
Krinkle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|krinklem...@gmail.com |esand...@wikimedia.org
Target Milestone|--
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Comment #1 from vssun ---
Created attachment 13198
--> https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/attachment.cgi?id=13198&action=edit
Attachment 2
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
vssun changed:
What|Removed |Added
Web browser|--- |Firefox
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #21 from Rainer Rillke @commons.wikimedia
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Those admins (currently 270) + users with edit rights of campaigns
> gave us a lot of trouble.
Thanks for the flowsers. How can you say such a thing without a
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #22 from Romaine ---
I posted a bug earlier about the problems with the upload campaigns. I was
realistic and mentioned only the technical part in the bug. (The organizational
part we did ourselves.)
A colleague who helped out with
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #23 from Romaine ---
> And nothing is preventing you from continuing to do that.
>
> I'm going to disengage and continue my work unless you (or someone else?)
> actually raises issues that are relevant, and stop ignoring the fact t
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Comment #2 from vssun ---
Sorry for the incorrect attachment links on the above comments. Please correct
it if somebody can.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #24 from Romaine ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> (In reply to comment #4)
> > Those admins (currently 270) + users with edit rights of campaigns
> > gave us a lot of trouble.
> Thanks for the flowsers. How can you say such a thing w
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53434
Gerrit Notification Bot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |PATCH_TO_REVIEW
--
You are
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53434
--- Comment #5 from Gerrit Notification Bot ---
Change 81886 had a related patch set uploaded by GWicke:
Bug 53434: Only skip about siblings if about is actually set
https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/81886
--
You are receiving this mail because
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53434
Gabriel Wicke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |High
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
--- Comment #25 from Romaine ---
In January 2013 we had an evaluation about Wiki Loves Monuments. I cite:
Source:
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wiki_Loves_Monuments_2012/Evaluation
> Romaine: bug https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/sh
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53572
--- Comment #3 from James Forrester ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Sorry for the incorrect attachment links on the above comments. Please
> correct it if somebody can.
Sorry, links in comments can't be edited in Bugzilla. :-(
--
You are rece
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50411
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53469
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52884
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Low
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52791
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Low
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51521
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roan.katt...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51423
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roan.katt...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53315
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53252
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Normal |Low
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52327
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roan.katt...@gmail.com,
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50526
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52675
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Normal
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52562
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53570
Rainer Rillke @commons.wikimedia changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rainerril...@hotmail
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49143
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|50882 |
See Also|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50882
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51411
James Forrester changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|Unprioritized |Low
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53525
Woojin Kim changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kwj2...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Woo
501 - 600 of 715 matches
Mail list logo