[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T134989: WDQS empty response - transfer clsoed with 15042 bytes remaining to read

ema added a comment. The issue can be reproduced running two varnishd on the same host, without any VCL. A web server listening on port 80 is also needed, serving any type of file. I've used a 612 bytes HTML page. /usr/sbin/varnishd -a :3128 -b localhost:80 -p default_ttl=5 -p

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Updated] T65732: [Story] Handle localised digits in formatters and parsers

matej_suchanek added a blocked task: T103834: [Epic] Improve input elements for complex datatypes. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T65732 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: matej_suchanek Cc: Aklapper, Wikidata-bugs, aude,

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Updated] T103834: [Epic] Improve input elements for complex datatypes

matej_suchanek added a blocking task: T65732: [Story] Handle localised digits in formatters and parsers. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T103834 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: matej_suchanek Cc: gerritbot, Aklapper,

Re: [Wikidata] Ontology

Citiranje Gerard Meijssen : > I have stopped expecting necessary changes from Wikidata. It has been made > clear that dates will be associated with labels. By the way we can and do > already indicate the validity of facts on time. I can't see why would dates be

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T117693: [Story] ArticlePlaceholder pages should show up in search engines

Nemo_bis added a comment. > I imagine this has been extensively discussed, if it has do you have a pointer handy? See parent task. TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T117693 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Lucie,

Re: [Wikidata] Ontology

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Gerard Meijssen wrote: > We are talking DSM. When the DSM had never called something a disease and > never had a consistent presentation. When there is a lot of literature > showing how that something is NOT a disease, why persist on

Re: [Wikidata] Ontology

Hoi, We are talking DSM. When the DSM had never called something a disease and never had a consistent presentation. When there is a lot of literature showing how that something is NOT a disease, why persist on what has always been wrong in any which case? Thanks, GerardM On 14 May 2016 at

Re: [Wikidata] Wikidata and Wiktionary: an IEG proposal to build a database of etymological relationships based on Wiktionary and an associated visualization

Ester, This looks like a great idea and though I am a big fan of helpful maps as illustrations, generating a .png per word could be very burdensome. Could your software reside on Toollabs? I see uses for such visualizations with words on Wikidata, not only through the context of Wiktionary, but

[Wikidata] Wiki Workshop at ICWSM '16: Accepted papers and invited speakers

We are glad to announce our invited speaker lineup and 19 papers accepted at the wiki research workshop we will be hosting on May 17, 2016 at the *10th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media* (ICWSM '16 ) in

Re: [Wikidata] Ontology

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 9:37 PM, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > Gerard Meijssen, 14/05/2016 15:39: >> >> When an external ontology says that something is a disease and the DSM-5 >> says it is not. There is a huge problem. > > > Until recently DSM called homosexuality a disease,

Re: [Wikidata] Ontology

Gerard Meijssen, 14/05/2016 15:39: When an external ontology says that something is a disease and the DSM-5 says it is not. There is a huge problem. Until recently DSM called homosexuality a disease, we must live with conflicts.

Re: [Wikidata] Ontology

Hoi, The problem is that when there is no agreement on its existence, when it is highly stigmatic, when it determines the life of people because of an opinion. It is damaging to persist on including it as a disease and accepting the consequences that it has. Thanks, GerardM On 14 May 2016 at

Re: [Wikidata] Ontology

On Sat, May 14, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Gerard Meijssen wrote: > When an external ontology says that something is a disease and the DSM-5 > says it is not. There is a huge problem. How is DSM-5 not an ontology itself? Why is this a huge problem? Isn't this just two sources

Re: [Wikidata] Ontology

Why would that be a problem? Disagreement between authoritative resources/ontologies is not uncommon. I would argue that as long as the references to the disagreeing resources are properly set it is for the user to decide which external resource to believe. Just curious, but which disease is not

[Wikidata] Ontology

Hoi, When an external ontology says that something is a disease and the DSM-5 says it is not. There is a huge problem. When something is not what it is said to be. Should we allow for things that are diametrical the opposite of each other. The problem is that labels like this have a massive