[Wikidata] Re: web reference

On Mon, 31 Jul 2023 at 16:40, Marie-Claude Lemaire wrote: > I do not know how to get the complete url as required by google to > suppress it. Their advice is to contact the webmaster of the site. > If you mean the complete URL of the Wikidata entry for Marie-Claude Lemiaire, the URL is: *http

[Wikidata] Re: web reference

On Sat, 29 Jul 2023 at 09:36, Markus Bärlocher wrote: > I understand the very urgent desire that after a name change it is also > tracked on the web. And I understand that if after 18 years of struggle > this is undone again, the suffering is great. A person's name is one of > the most important

[Wikidata] Re: Announce: New OpenLink Virtuoso hosted Wikidata Knowledge Graph Release

Really cool! :) If anyone has eg student project possibilities, it would be great to see some work on Wikidata SPARQL query portability- eg working through the list at query.wikidata.org, which tend to look like this: SELECT ?item ?itemLabel WHERE { ?item wdt:P31 wd:Q146. # Must be of a cat

[Wikidata] Re: Challenge of the day: sports season without sports

On Fri, 23 Dec 2022 at 21:32, Peter F. Patel-Schneider < pfpschnei...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why should this not be done? It seems reasonable to me. Is there some > official statement that this should not be done? > The Blazegraph Wikidata SPARQL endpoint (as it is a sadly abandoned codebase) al

[Wikidata] Re: A Wikidata App?

On Thu, 3 Feb 2022 at 13:59, geislemx wrote: > Hey all, > > I hope this mail finds you well in this trying times. > Over the last month I invested some time and put a little project > together for personal purpose. Long story short it is a small > Wikidata/Wikibase App for Android. > > Currently

[Wikidata] Re: Private Information Retrieval

On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 at 07:44, Darius Runge wrote: > Dear all, > > I started using WikiData for Private Information Retrieval. This allows > answering certain questions while maintaining a high degree of secrecy. > Suppose you wanted to know when Einstein was born, but for some reason you > must k

[Wikidata] Re: Change list policy for call for papers postings?

On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 at 11:11, Peter Patel-Schneider wrote: > On Sun, 2021-09-19 at 12:17 +0300, Federico Leva (Nemo) wrote: > > [...] > > > The Wikidata community also can't benefit from those publications > > unless > > they're made (libre) open access, so I think it would be fair to > > require

[Wikidata] Re: Change list policy for call for papers postings?

Re-reading a second after hitting send, I realise my misinterpretation of these conclusions, which were not jumbled. The result was that one list is more tolerant of certain cfps, the other is no-cfps. Apologies for the extra noise. On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 at 09:38, Dan Brickley wrote: > > &g

[Wikidata] Re: Change list policy for call for papers postings?

On Sun, 19 Sep 2021 at 09:18, Jan Ainali wrote: > I find all these academic call for papers/abstracts/submissions emails on > this mailing list a bit spammy. > > I would be okay with them if the person mailing introduced it with a > sentence or two why they believe it to be specifically interesti

[Wikidata] Re: History of some original Wikidata design decisions?

On Mon, 26 Jul 2021 at 11:58, Jan Dittrich wrote: > I would be very interested in Wikidatas Relation to Cyc > on one hand and the semantic Web on > the other. > this isn’t written down in one place well, yet Here is one strand of history, emphasising from Cyc

[Wikidata] Re: History of some original Wikidata design decisions?

On Fri, 23 Jul 2021 at 19:10, Ed Summers wrote: > > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 6:56 PM Denny Vrandečić < > > dvrande...@wikimedia.org> wrote: > > > > > > I hope that helps with the historical deep dive :) Lydia and I > > > really should write that book! > > A Wikidata book would be most excellent,

Re: [Wikidata] Concise/Notable Wikidata Dump

On Sat, 21 Dec 2019 at 17:25, Lydia Pintscher wrote: > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 11:16 PM Aidan Hogan wrote: > > - @Lydia, good point! I was thinking that filtering by wikilinks will > > just drop some more obscure nodes (like Q51366847 for example), but had > > not considered that there are some

Re: [Wikidata] [BREAKING] Planned RDF ontology prefix change

If you're making the change, maybe worth going to https: as it'll be painful to do later? On Wed, 17 Oct 2018 at 15:22, Stas Malyshev wrote: > Hi! > > We are planning to change the prefix and associated URIs in RDF > representation for Wikidata from: > > PREFIX wikibase:

Re: [Wikidata] Passing on praise/ISWC trip report

Yes, Wikidata was *everywhere*! Definitely a sense of milestone / "achievement unlocked" :) On Fri, 12 Oct 2018, 17:30 Markus Kroetzsch, wrote: > Dear all, > > I am happy to report that we have just won the Best Paper Award of the > In-Use track of this year's International Semantic Web Conferen

Re: [Wikidata] Mapping back to Schema.org needs "broader external class"

On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 at 16:35, Thad Guidry wrote: > Hi Team ! > +Dan Brickley +Lydia Pintscher > > > Schema.org mapping is progressing on every new Weekly Summary "Newest > properties" listing. > That's great ! And thanks to Léa and team for providing the n

Re: [Wikidata] Wikidata + Wikipedia outreach

On 5 January 2018 at 13:33, Brill Lyle wrote: > Hi Jane, > > Actually, "the rest of your email is irrelevant" illustrates the > problem. I am a bit baffled at this statement. > > The rest of the email is the *whole point*, and dismissing it illustrates > the actual problem here. If Wikidatans don