With #cvn-wikidata another countervandalism channel already exists. Perhaps it would be better to report your results there as well?
> Op 27 feb. 2016 om 18:25 heeft Amir Ladsgroup <ladsgr...@gmail.com> het > volgende geschreven: > > Hey all, > I've been working to make vandalism detection easier and I was able to build > an AI tool that scores each and every edit for being vandalism. It's one step > forward but not enough, since using these scores is hard. So I'm working on > building tools that makes these scores more useable for you. The long-term > goal is using the ORES extension. it is working now in beta cluster [1] and > you can test it in [2] as well. Once we are done with Wikidata:Edit labels > [3] we are good to deploy this as a beta feature in Wikidata (we are waiting > for something else too but hopefully it's done very soon) > > But I wanted something helpful in short-term too. So in this weekend*, I > registered #wikidata-vandalism IRC channel in freenode and I made a bot that > reports unpatrolled edits with high scores every six minutes if they are made > in the last six minutes. So If you join that channel you can see the bot adds > edits that need review very soon after the edit has been made (basically it's > a live reporting edits needing review) > > Source code is in github and PRs are very welcome :) [4] > > [1]: > https://en.wikipedia.beta.wmflabs.org/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChanges > [2]: https://mw-revscoring.wmflabs.org > [3]: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Edit_labels > [4]: https://github.com/Ladsgroup/ORES-IRC-Wikidata-bot > > * My weekend is Thursday and Friday :) > Best > _______________________________________________ > Wikidata mailing list > Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
_______________________________________________ Wikidata mailing list Wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata
