On fim 27.ágú 2015 15:52, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
> On 27.08.2015 14:43, Svavar Kjarrval wrote:
>> So far from the other thread, the current need seems to be for two types
>> of definitions:
>> 1. How to interpret declarations depending on associated properties.
>
item in the specific link has precedence, then
the machine would solve it by determining that mayors are generally
humans but Stubbs being a cat is an exception to that rule.
[1] Didn't see the Highlander reference until I had written it.
- Svavar Kjarrval
signature.asc
Des
e should find out why it's happening.
Is there a tool where one can put in a Wikidata item and it extracts
declarations based on "higher" properties like subclass or instance of?
Like if I were to input the item for Stubbs, it would travel the
hierarchy and tell me what would
The problem is that a machine cannot
automatically understand that. Without special programming and/or a way
to define contradictions like that in Wikidata, both facts are assumed
to be correct. The machine might not even know that there is a
contradiction at all
t list due
to travelling backwards via such relations.
In essence, it seems like P21 either wrongfully allows definitions of
genders of non-humans or that the property is too broad for a
declaration of P31->Q18608871.
- Svavar Kjarrval
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
which indicates in machine
readable interpretation that it is about the gender of people, yet the
descriptions assume items can be associated with P21 to include gender
of animals. Yeah, I can understand the confusion. :/
- Svavar Kjarrval
signature.asc
Des
