ive checking. If the group
> interests you, please do feel free to support the creation of the group:
> https://www.w3.org/community/groups/proposed/#services .
>
>
>
> *From: *Thad Guidry
> *Sent: *Friday, February 5, 2021 3:12 PM
> *To: *Discussion list for the Wikidata proj
ore experimental project<mailto:wikisp...@lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Wikidata] [Wikimedia-l] Idea of a new project: Wikifacts ?
Oops, the better link for the Schema.org work to support fact checking (some
even still in progress after 3 years) probably should have been this:
http://blo
s.wikimedia.org>
Cc: wikitec...@lists.wikimedia.org<mailto:wikitec...@lists.wikimedia.org>
Subject: Re: [Wikidata] [Wikimedia-l] Idea of a new project: Wikifacts ?
Sounds like a great Page/Data/Media interplay, of interest to Wikispore if
there's any need for customization. SJ
O
Oops, the better link for the Schema.org work to support fact checking
(some even still in progress after 3 years) probably should have been this:
http://blog.schema.org/2017/08/schemaorg-33-news-fact-checking.html
Thad
https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/
https://calendly.com/thadguidry/
_
How to record Facts for human and machine consumption and the usage of
those recorded Facts by humans, machines, news orgs, communities, etc. is
something that was only lightly documented about 4+ years ago?
I don't know what happened to that document but thought it was very useful
for getting eve
Sounds like a great Page/Data/Media interplay, of interest to Wikispore if
there's any need for customization. SJ
On Fri, Feb 5, 2021 at 2:37 PM Adam Sobieski
wrote:
> A “Wikifacts” sister project is a great idea. “Wikifacts” seems distinct
> from both Wikinews and Wikidata. With some schemas f
A “Wikifacts” sister project is a great idea. “Wikifacts” seems distinct from
both Wikinews and Wikidata. With some schemas for facts, defining their
structure and interrelations, one could, however, utilize Wikidata as a backend.
Brainstorming, while I’m sure that those in these mailing lists a