On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Thomas Pellissier-Tanon
thoma...@google.com wrote:
I have only added the most used 1000 properties in order to don't hide
important properties with less important ones. But feel free to add
properties that are not listed there.
Most frequent isn't the same as
@Andy
It seems to me that, before the dats can be imported, we'll need to add
several new Wikidata properties. Was that your intention?
Run multiple times my mapping script from Freebase to Wikidata is easy so I
think I'll run it again as soon as the mapping is really improved and add
the added
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
On 16 June 2015 at 19:43, Thomas Pellissier-Tanon thoma...@google.com wrote:
I've just added to the page properties for chemistry:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Freebase/Mapping#Chemistry
It
:24:20 -0700
From: Thomas Pellissier-Tanonthoma...@google.com
To:wikidata@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikidata] Help needed for Freebase to Wikidata migration
Message-ID:
CAM9+YaS_Vjx24RTNcyeE6yvdiuyVDvyB1sGN1jGkN8jZO=f...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Hey everyone
On 16 June 2015 at 19:43, Thomas Pellissier-Tanon thoma...@google.com wrote:
- 698735 triples with media_common/cataloged_instance/isbn13
- 692557 triples with book/book_edition/isbn
So, I think we may just ignore book/book_edition/isbn and map
media_common/cataloged_instance/isbn13 to P212.
On 16 June 2015 at 19:43, Thomas Pellissier-Tanon thoma...@google.com wrote:
I've just added to the page properties for chemistry:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:WikiProject_Freebase/Mapping#Chemistry
It seems to me that, before the dats can be imported, we'll need to
add several new
Dear Thomas,
I am personally interested in the chemistry bits, and checked the
list, but did not see the chemistry domain from Freebase:
https://www.freebase.com/chemistry/chemical_compound?schema=
Is that just a matter of timing, or is it left out because WP/WD
already has a good coverage?
Hi!
Yes, such matching are useful. The goal here is to move data from Freebase
to Wikidata. So, we don't need 1-1 relation because the direction Wikidata
to Freebase is not important. What we want here is that, if we replace the
Freebase property by the Wikidata one, the relation remains valid.
