Ah, thanks, Luke. I thought it was constrained to only the main entity and
not just any claims from a Wikipedia page. But it seems that the
description is pretty clear there ...
Describes claims imported from Wikimedia projects like Wikipedia, either by
> bots or manually. For other sources, use
I’ve added a second reference with, as far as I know, the preferred way
to model this: “imported from Wikimedia project” + “Wikimedia import
URL” (via the “permanent link” in the sidebar on the Wikipedia article).
I’m not sure if a “retrieved” date should also be added.
Cheers,
Lucas
On 06.03.19
How are folks commonly giving references back to Wikipedia page mentions?
My use case seems to be causing a constraint violation and I'd like to know
how to better handle that reference case.
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q61976849
Thanks in advance!
Thad
https://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/
