On 16.12.2015 11:10, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
In the WDQ database all the data on P and Q values exist. It is stable
and it has proven itself over the last years as flexible and very fast.
Why build another database that is specific to one goal when another
database already exists that
On 16.12.2015 09:06, Gerard Meijssen wrote:
Hoi,
The WDQ database is likely to include all the information that you need.
It is optimised to be fast. Did you consider to use it?
Can you explain this a bit more? How would I use the WDQ database for
this application? (I guess you don't mean via
Hoi,
The WDQ database is likely to include all the information that you need. It
is optimised to be fast. Did you consider to use it?
Thanks,
GerardM
On 15 December 2015 at 22:54, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Something to be noted here is that initial
Hoi,
In the WDQ database all the data on P and Q values exist. It is stable and
it has proven itself over the last years as flexible and very fast. Why
build another database that is specific to one goal when another database
already exists that largely provides a similar function? A database that
Hi,
Something to be noted here is that initial loading is quite a bit slower
than it used to be, since there are a lot more classes now. We are
looking into options of making this faster, but this might need a full
rewrite to become really fast. The good thing is that loading only has
to
Hoi,
Would it be possible to have other data to compare it with. When you see a
delta, you can understand about the developments in the data. Single data
views while of interest do not inspire people to work even more on their
favourite topic.
Mine would be for now P166.
Thanks,
GerardM
On
Hi all,
there are some good news: I updated the Miga Classes and Properties
Browser which collects several statistics about classes and properties
used in Wikidata. In the future it will be updated monthly.
You can find it here: http://tools.wmflabs.org/wikidata-exports/miga/
Hint: Since