Re: [Wikidata] Weekly Summary #361

8 Message d'origine De : Léa Lacroix Date : 2019/04/23 15:10 (GMT+01:00) À : "Discussion list for the Wikidata project." Objet : [Wikidata] Weekly Summary #361 Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week. Events

Re: [Wikidata] Weekly Summary #361

Interestong! That looks like a legitimate ORCID record which has had the name field garbled for some reason - the publications/affiliations all seem to be associated with a single distinct person. Suspect the best thing we can do is relabel it at our end (since the QID reflects the person) and

Re: [Wikidata] Weekly Summary #361

On Tue, 23 Apr 2019 at 17:00, Thomas Douillard wrote: > weird item : https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q57439158 . Seems to > originate from Orchid and looks like a bug from an automated tool. I've reported this to the ORCID support team. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk

Re: [Wikidata] Weekly Summary #361

Hi Thomas, Great that you discovered this! In my experience the tool can indeed be used to surface issues with our data that would be harder to discover in other ways. By keeping the tool in sync with Wikidata, the idea is to encourage users to fix the data directly there (probably by fixing the

Re: [Wikidata] Weekly Summary #361

I played a bit with OpenTapioca, and trying to annotate a « nature briefing » newsletter I found something weird : « Nature » is mapped not to the scientific publication entity, but first to this weird item : https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q57439158 . Seems to originate from Orchid and looks like a

[Wikidata] Weekly Summary #361

*Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.* Events - Past: Editathon Where iNaturalist meets Wiki