Nikki added a comment.
On https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat#Other_sites two
suggestions were "other Wikimedia sites" and "other sister sites".
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T102417
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailp
daniel added a comment.
@Reguyla Of course it would not make sense to split commons by language. But it
doesn't make sense to have a "section" for just one project, either. It did not
even occur to me that "other" may be interpreted as "non-WMF". It's intended to
mean "other than Wikipedia and
Reguyla added a comment.
@Daniel, I don't really have a suggestion for renaming the box from Other
wiki's but when I think of "Other wiki's" I think of Shoutwiki and Wikia, not
other WMF projects. Maybe I'm the only one, but that seems rather confusing to
me. Also, the argument that Commons is
Mike_Peel added a comment.
Having a separate box for Commons would make it a lot clearer that commons
links can be added in the same way that other sister sites can be. It would be
nice if we could include two links, one to the page and one to the category,
where relevant. There may also be rel
daniel added a subscriber: daniel.
daniel added a comment.
Having a separate box or section for a single site doesn't make sense. Commons
is a "singleton" project, like meta, not a family, so a section isn't useful
for grouping. It has nothing to do with how often it appears, or how big or
impo
