Jdlrobson added a comment.
It's definitely a concern to be thinking about. Showing an edit link in Wikipedia will drive traffic there.
If we implemented this we'd need to make sure
it's configurable so can be shut off if and when needed
We should make this logged in only to start with
We could
JKatzWMF added a comment.
@Sjoerddebruin thanks for your comment! The short answer to your question is that we don't know for sure, but maybe describing our thought process will be helpful and I am curious to hear your perspective.
The thought was that the ratio of visibility to editability of
Sjoerddebruin added a comment.
As a Wikidata editor, I would like to say that we already got a lot of description vandalism. What kind of influence will this have?TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T141230EMAIL
Jdlrobson added a comment.
In T141230#2555431, @dr0ptp4kt wrote:
@Jdlrobson, are you saying the link from within the MobileFrontend _javascript_-based editor like in the mock is about a 1 pointer?
Not quite 1 but in that ball park given it's just a link to another page - although we should be
Nirzar added a comment.
@Jdlrobson also notice the article title being formatted differently on a grey background to indicate that it's not editable. so again, separation of chrome and contentTASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T141230EMAIL
dr0ptp4kt added a comment.
@Jdlrobson, are you saying the link from within the MobileFrontend _javascript_-based editor like in the mock is about a 1 pointer?TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T141230EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To:
