Pintoch added a comment.
@Lydia_Pintscher that makes sense. Okay, thank you to you both, we are on the same page! Given all these tickets on the topic I was worried that I had missed something obvious about this issue…TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T173749EMAIL
Lydia_Pintscher added a comment.
Right and I don't think there is desire to change that. But for tools like the primary sources tool that could ingest rdf and then feed data into Wikidata through the usual API I think that'd be ok.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T173749EMAIL
Smalyshev added a comment.
Right now RDF is only a secondary database format, so all imports are supposed to go through Wikibase instance, using one of Wikibase import formats. Using RDF for import AFAIK is not a use case we currently implement.TASK
Lydia_Pintscher added a comment.
I am not aware of any "standard" but this is the time to make one then I guess ;-)TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T173749EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: Lydia_PintscherCc: Pintoch, Aklapper,
Pintoch added a comment.
@Smalyshev thanks for your quick reply! Just for clarity, I am not personally working on the PST, I was just trying to find out if there was any established way to use RDF to represent a data import. If that is the case, then other tools could use that format too (for
Pintoch added a comment.
@Lydia_Pintscher , @Smalyshev and @Tpt : is there any info about how RDF is expected to behave as an import format for Wikidata? As far as I can tell, the RDF that gets fed into the Query Service is not designed for import at all:
first, there is a lot of redundancy:
