[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T204471: WikibaseQualityConstraints include extension name in UA for query service requests

2018-10-08 Thread Addshore
Addshore added a comment. This should be verified once deployed. This should be deployed on the evening of the 17th October. We can verify by making sure the query service gets requests with the new UATASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T204471EMAIL

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T204471: WikibaseQualityConstraints include extension name in UA for query service requests

2018-10-04 Thread gerritbot
gerritbot added a comment. Change 463923 merged by jenkins-bot: [mediawiki/extensions/WikibaseQualityConstraints@master] Set custom user agent in SparqlHelper https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/463923TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T204471EMAIL

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T204471: WikibaseQualityConstraints include extension name in UA for query service requests

2018-10-02 Thread gerritbot
gerritbot added a comment. Change 463923 had a related patch set uploaded (by Ladsgroup; owner: Amir Sarabadani): [mediawiki/extensions/WikibaseQualityConstraints@master] Set custom user agent in SparqlHelper https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/463923TASK

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T204471: WikibaseQualityConstraints include extension name in UA for query service requests

2018-09-17 Thread Smalyshev
Smalyshev added a comment. Rate limiting is bucketing based on IP+User agent, so having distinctive user agent for WBQC is certainly a good idea.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T204471EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: SmalyshevCc:

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T204471: WikibaseQualityConstraints include extension name in UA for query service requests

2018-09-17 Thread Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE
Lucas_Werkmeister_WMDE added a comment. TBD / TBA does the query service actually differentiate requests from a single IP with different UAs? That sounds like a really easy way for any spammer to circumvent a ban, so I would be very surprised if we actually did this tbh. Proposed UA: