[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T214244: New constraint type "Unused"

2019-06-05 Thread Lydia_Pintscher
Lydia_Pintscher added a comment. Can you please clarify if/how this is different from T214243 ? And why is using "property scope: no value" not an option? TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T214244 EMAIL PREFERENCES

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T214244: New constraint type "Unused"

2019-02-15 Thread Bugreporter
Bugreporter added a comment. In https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/replacement_property, another use case is provided.TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T214244EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: BugreporterCc:

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T214244: New constraint type "Unused"

2019-01-20 Thread Liuxinyu970226
Liuxinyu970226 added a comment. why not just no value for them?TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T214244EMAIL PREFERENCEShttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/To: Liuxinyu970226Cc: Liuxinyu970226, abian, Aklapper, Bugreporter, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86,

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T214244: New constraint type "Unused"

2019-01-19 Thread abian
abian added a comment. @Bugreporter, do you think we could get the same with the already existing "property scope" constraint by not using any qualifier to specify a scope or by specifying the scope as "no value"?TASK DETAILhttps://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T214244EMAIL