Hanna_Petruschat_WMDE added a comment.
@Tarrow Thanks for the write up!
One more suggestion: Assuming that no one likes to see an error message and
we already know, that hitting publish again could solve the issue: Could we
automatically hit publish again in the background when we didn't h
Tarrow added a comment.
> In the worst case they change something else, the first edit went through,
and other people have edited the item in the meantime as well.
I understand the reasoning here. I was particularly thinking about the a
variant of this scenario: no one else has edited bu
