[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T246456: Performance review of Wikidata Bridge

darthmon_wmde added a comment. In T246456#6183741 , @aaron wrote: > From the perspective of popular/major articles, likely to have infoboxes, the extra 42.1 KB for loading the "app" JS doesn't seem crazy. I've looked through code severa

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T246456: Performance review of Wikidata Bridge

aaron added a comment. From the perspective of popular/major articles, likely to have infoboxes, the extra 42.1 KB for loading the "app" JS doesn't seem crazy. I've looked through code several times and it seems reasonable. Testing with fast/slow 3G doesn't reveal obnoxious reflows or delay

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T246456: Performance review of Wikidata Bridge

aaron added a comment. I've been looking at this from time to time, and haven't found anything real problems yet. Some of the things I'm looking out for are: - Pageview critical path effects: - Bytes (JS) - Bytes (CSS+images) - Page load delay - First input delay - Co

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T246456: Performance review of Wikidata Bridge

darthmon_wmde added a comment. In T246456#6118897 , @aaron wrote: > In T246456#6116523 , @darthmon_wmde wrote: > >> hey @aaron, @Gilles, >> >> could you, please, give us an updat