Mike_Peel added a comment.
@Lydia_Pintscher Yes, editable by autoconfirmed users. The discussion is
still ongoing, and I'm not quite sure how to close it, see
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Project_chat#When/how_to_close_this?
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T254280
Lydia_Pintscher added a comment.
Agreed. Let's go with $wgNamespaceProtection. So I take it you'd like us to
set this to allow the Property namespace to be only editable by autoconfirmed
users, correct?
TASK DETAIL
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T254280
EMAIL PREFERENCES
https://phab
Mike_Peel added a comment.
@addshore The property-term user right is something that would have to be
granted so that people could edit property labels, right? I think that's going
too far for now as it would have to be given to quite a few editors.
$wgNamespaceProtection sounds good.
TASK D
Jasper added a comment.
I agree with Addshore: the abuse filter's performance should not be hindered
by this kind of "namespace" protection. $wgNamespaceProtection is what's needed
here.
In my opinion, if you have no business altering property terms, you have no
business editing that pr
Addshore added a comment.
$wgNamespaceProtection could be a good option
AbuseFilter and bot protection should probably not be used if the idea is to
protect all properties.
We also currently have a user right for altering property terms which could
be useful?
Change Property ter
