noarave updated the task description. (Show Details) |
CHANGES TO TASK DESCRIPTION
The migration from our current code to the new format (via SchemaUpdater) can be incompatible, we don’t need to support loading old Schema pages, just keep it simple and only support whatever new format we choose. (But we may as well keep the schema version counter and increment it.)
...
Internally, those methods load the existing schema, update it and then store it completely back in a new revision. (That is, the schema doesn’t receive e. g. labels in other languages as a parameter, but they still have to end up in the new revision.)The migration from our current code to the new format (via SchemaUpdater) can be incompatible, we don’t need to support loading old Schema pages, just keep it simple and only support whatever new format we choose. (But we may as well keep the schema version counter and increment it.)
TASK DETAIL
EMAIL PREFERENCES
To: noarave
Cc: Aklapper, noarave, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, YULdigitalpreservation, LawExplorer, _jensen, abian, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Lydia_Pintscher, Mbch331
Cc: Aklapper, noarave, Nandana, Lahi, Gq86, GoranSMilovanovic, QZanden, YULdigitalpreservation, LawExplorer, _jensen, abian, Wikidata-bugs, aude, Lydia_Pintscher, Mbch331
_______________________________________________ Wikidata-bugs mailing list Wikidata-bugs@lists.wikimedia.org https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikidata-bugs