[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T220962: Break cyclic namespace dependencies in WikibaseLexeme

Addshore added a comment. If it were in Model/DummyObjects would it still show up as an issue in this report? TASK DETAIL https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T220962 EMAIL PREFERENCES https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/settings/panel/emailpreferences/ To: Addshore Cc: Addshore, Aklapper,

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T220962: Break cyclic namespace dependencies in WikibaseLexeme

alaa_wmde added a comment. Looked a bit into this. In T220962#5272561 , @Addshore wrote: > I'm not sure if we really need to solve the DummyObjects <-> Model connection. > If you look at it, what is happening makes sense? We

[Wikidata-bugs] [Maniphest] [Commented On] T220962: Break cyclic namespace dependencies in WikibaseLexeme

Addshore added a comment. I'm not sure if we really need to solve the DummyObjects <-> Model connection. If you look at it, what is happening makes sense? We could just put the Dummy Objects inside the Model NS, but having them separate makes things easier to follow. TASK DETAIL