I think you want it to be "Popular print". I changed it for
you.http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1306119http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_print
> From: rupert.thur...@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:29:24 +0100
> To: wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
> Subject: [Wikidata-l] is there a "schema"
Yes, I think once qualifiers are enabled you would just have something
like:...Property(head of local government)...Value(Elizabeth I) -
Qualifier("1558-1603") - Sources()Value(James VI and I) -
Qualifier("1603-1625") - Sources()..
There was a discussion about whether qualif
hi,
i am not even sure if i use the right vocabulary here, but is there
some "schema" for claims or statements of a libraries collection? i
wanted to add a type, and ended up linking it to "collection". the
translation then revealed that it is from horses dressage
http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q25
Thanks Denny for the update and everybody else for the feedback.
The cases I am particularly interested in are those of qualifiers to express
that "Elizabeth I was Queen of England between 1558 and 1603", or that "the
city of Vibo Valentia was in the Province of Catanzaro up to 1996, in the
Pro
That is a tough question. We are pretty sure that we technically scale
quite well, and there is no reason that the community should restrict
itself out of technical reasons. If the number of item suddenly increases
by one or two orders of magnitudes, we would probably meet a few hiccups on
the way,
A topic I've been involved in recently regards statistics for gun violence in
the US. The government publishes a big report every year, but it takes them
most of the year to collect the information from all of the local police
agencies and compile the results. Several English Wikipedia articles
In general, I do like the idea of periodically collecting article references
into Wikidata. They are a type of structured data that is associated with every
article, and there are lots of interesting queries that would be easier to do
if that information was in a structured database. I don't kno
This has also been aired in other discussions. Outdated entries can
both be something that is only valid within a set timeframe, but can
also be dependent on something else. One special case is when an
external source do not support a specific statement anymore.
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 11:59 AM, M
Le 2013-03-14 02:09, Michael Hale a écrit :
I think of Wikidata as the symbiotic version of Freebase. I won't say
Freebase is a parasite, but I think a core aspect of Wikidata is that
edits to the database will often feed back into the encyclopedia in
various places. I haven't looked too much at
Hoi,
The qualifiers, would that be something like ... if the language is
English, the string can be a noun, a verb, an adjective
When the sting is a Dutch noun, it can be masculine, feminine or neuter ??
When a qualifier allows for such constructs, we are halfway there to
implementing a stru
Hi Dario,
two or three features are still missing to enable that (sorted in order we
are probably going to deploy them):
* qualifiers
* the time datatype
* statement ranks
As soon as they are available, this can be modeled in a way that it can be
useful for projects accessing the data.
So, progr
So is the question whether there should be strong types for qualifiers as
opposed to just a string with custom logic for each type of template box that
will be displayed in articles? My opinion is that it is too difficult to know
in advance how many and what types of qualifiers the data will hav
Such an old topic, and was unread in my mailbox by now. :-)
Although having validity intervals in Data would be great, I think now, as
we have Lua, there is a client-side approach at least for such specific
data as DB's timetable that is interesting mostly for dewiki.
--
Bináris
13 matches
Mail list logo
