On 06/21/2013 08:00 AM, Aubrey wrote:
> Another dream of mine is an annotator that could save "facts" in Wikidata
> statements.
> We could reald a newspaper online, or a book, or an article on a scientific
> blog, and highlight a short sentence, and this sentence would be a
> statement (Item has a
Welcome :)
2013/7/1 Vito
> Il 01/07/2013 16:55, Adam Shorland ha scritto:
>
> Hi! I'm Adam. I have just started working at WMDE on Wikidata which is
> contributing towards my placement year at University in the UK.
>
> I will be around for at least the next 6 months which I am sure will be
>
Il 01/07/2013 16:55, Adam Shorland ha scritto:
Hi! I'm Adam. I have just started working at WMDE on Wikidata which is
contributing towards my placement year at University in the UK.
I will be around for at least the next 6 months which I am sure will
be great! I'm going to be working on lots
We really need to keep everything in one forum. Can you two please copy
your comments to
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Requests_for_comment/Primary_sorting_propertyand
continue the discussion there? I worry that the person closing the
discussion might not be on the mailing list and might n
Hoi,
The reason why it is NOT good enough and what you fail to understand is
that this is NOT an attribute that we should morph into something else. Its
name makes it clear: "main type (GND)" this implies that the definition and
its values are external to Wikidata; they are the definition as per th
2013/7/1 Adam Shorland :
> Hi! I'm Adam. I have just started working at WMDE on Wikidata which is
> contributing towards my placement year at University in the UK.
>
> I will be around for at least the next 6 months which I am sure will be
> great! I'm going to be working on lots of bits and pieces
Hi,
A colleague and me, we have prepared an alternative proposal for Wiktionary
support on Wikidata
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Wiktionary_%28alternative_proposal%29
It tries to address several problems that the former proposal had (see
comments page of the precedent proposal).
Thanks
I would say that GND is a “good enough” answer.
Most named entities are persons, organizations, events, creative works and
places and these are all mutually exclusive. There ought to be a system
interlock to prevent confusion between them.
“Organism Classification” or whatever you
Hi! I'm Adam. I have just started working at WMDE on Wikidata which is
contributing towards my placement year at University in the UK.
I will be around for at least the next 6 months which I am sure will be
great! I'm going to be working on lots of bits and pieces which I hope will
keep everyone h
Hi Sj,
There is a GsoC student that is working on the integration of the Annotator
into Mediawiki:
https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/User:Rjain/Proposal-Prototyping-inline-comments
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46440
Micru
On Sun, Jun 30, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Samuel Klein wrote:
>
For those interested in annotation data, this is a good time to inform the
development of the Annotator framework.
SJ
-- Forwarded message --
From: "Nick Stenning"
Date: Jun 29, 2013 9:15 AM
Subject: [annotator-dev] Annotator v2.0 work-in-progress
To: "annotator-...@lists.okfn.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
