Hi everyone,
Thank you very much for the pointers. What I am looking for is a dataset
with, at least, a list of organizations and their city, if there is more
information such as founders it will be good, if there are links between
organizations even better. As much context as better I should
Hi Bianca,
Concerning KBO there are several access points.
You can dereference the identifiers e.g.
http://data.kbodata.be/organisation/0476_068_080#id
http://data.kbodata.be/organisation/0476_068_080#id
There is a full text search facility, a OpenRefine compliant reconciliation
API, a sparql
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Greg Grossmeier g...@wikimedia.org wrote:
quote name=Thad Guidry date=2015-01-06 time=19:59:18 -0600
And so after some digging, and lack of responses on this thread,
Hi Thad!
I'm worried that the relevant people from the Wikidata/Wikibase project
just aren't
Back to Denny's original question:
Does anybody see a specific danger of abuse if living people get to edit
their own data right now? Entering wrong claims deliberately would maybe
not be the biggest issue here (since it is already in conflict with
other general policies -- we do not want
Hi Bianca,
In addition to Paul's answer:
There is a full text search facility, a OpenRefine compliant reconciliation
API, a sparql endpoint and a linked data fragment server all accessible (with
examples) from the home page at http://kbodata.be/.
You can easily fire SPARQL queries at the
Hoi,
English Wikipedia is not Wikipedia. It certainly is not any other project.
I certainly do not want the policies of English Wikipedia. It is bad enough
for en,wp itself
Thanks,
GerardM
On 7 January 2015 at 19:26, Peter F. Patel-Schneider pfpschnei...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wikipedia has
Also, when adding information to Wikipedia/Wikidata, it is best practice (but
not mandatory) to provide external references backing up your claims.
Nicolas.
On Wednesday, January 7, 2015 10:26 AM, Peter F. Patel-Schneider
pfpschnei...@gmail.com wrote:
Wikipedia has already
Markus, Denny and Wikidatans,
I don't, Markus. In the information age, this seems to be a widespread and
helpful practice in general (e.g. in LinkedIn and for some medical
records,, for example).
On the benefits of this side, this is a way for Wikidata to get most
accurate, and potentially,
On 7 January 2015 at 20:29, Nicolas Torzec torz...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Also, when adding information to Wikipedia/Wikidata, it is best practice
(but not mandatory) to provide external references backing up your claims.
Some property values are self referencing; VIAF and ORCID identifiers,
Irrespective of the general policy discussion, I have now been bold and
changed my item and user page to record that relationship as by my
earlier suggestion (as copied below):
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q18618630
I was wondering if, given that we have single signon, website account
on
Hoi,
Markus, is there no public domain picture for you... Please let it be a
flattering picture.. and please add it yourself...
grin I love the argument people make when they want to imply that you are
not that good looking /grin
Thanks,
Gerard
Hi Lydia,
It's more than that. I can get labels just fine with props=labels
Ideally there were be a Number 3 a reconcile service, or an API that
can be USED as a reconcile service.
Given a search string of Paris, let's say...
1. Return some disambiguating properties and their labels and
Yes I did try wbsearchentities, and your right, it returns more via a
search operator.
The problem with wbsearchentities is that it is limited and cannot
additionally pipe output for the claims information (ideally important
claims only, disambiguating claims/properties)
Thad
+ThadGuidry
Wikipedia has already addressed this question. See
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Autobiography. In summary, one should
not add or change information about oneself, unless the change could not be
considered to be non-controversial or there is some reason that a change
should be made
Hey folks :)
I'll be doing another office hour for Wikidata on IRC next Friday at
18:00 UTC. It'll happen in #wikimedia-office on Freenode IRC.
Everyone is welcome for discussions and question answering. Logs will
be posted afterwards.
For your timezone see
P.S. I also should declare a COI on this discussion: I am Q18618630. --
Markus
On 07.01.2015 15:25, Markus Krötzsch wrote:
Back to Denny's original question:
Does anybody see a specific danger of abuse if living people get to edit
their own data right now? Entering wrong claims deliberately
On 01/07/2015 09:02 AM, Thad Guidry wrote:
The closest starting point for a Reconcile API with the current API
structure that I can see is hacking a bit on this one:
https://www.wikidata.org/w/api.php?action=wbgetentitiessites=enwikititles=Parislanguages=enprops=descriptions|claims
Btw,
17 matches
Mail list logo
