Re: [Wikidata-l] [Wikisource-l] next sister project: Wikisource

2013-11-06 Thread Gerard Meijssen
Hoi, This makes perfect sense because Wikidata WANTS to use this information as the source for statements. Thanks, GerardM On 6 November 2013 02:12, billinghurst billinghu...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:27:02 +0100, Andrea Zanni zanni.andre...@gmail.com wrote: About this:

Re: [Wikidata-l] [Wikisource-l] next sister project: Wikisource

2013-11-06 Thread Andrea Zanni
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 2:12 AM, billinghurst billinghu...@gmail.com wrote: From my point of view, an upload form should be focused at Wikidata more than at Commons, anything else is back-to-front. If we are talking about a published work that it is published is its own notability and

Re: [Wikidata-l] [Wikisource-l] next sister project: Wikisource

2013-11-05 Thread Andrea Zanni
For the author pages it is quite straight-forward. For the bibliographic metadata the easiest would be to connect wikidata items with the Book: page generated by the (planned) Book Manager extension. The Book: page is supposed to provide the book structure and act as a metadata hub for both

Re: [Wikidata-l] [Wikisource-l] next sister project: Wikisource

2013-11-05 Thread Andrea Zanni
About this: On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:13 PM, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote: Connecting new uploaded books with Wikidata: again this is very related to the above. As a first preparatory step, one GsoC of this year worked on using templates (like commons:Template:Book) directly with the

Re: [Wikidata-l] [Wikisource-l] next sister project: Wikisource

2013-11-05 Thread billinghurst
On Tue, 5 Nov 2013 17:27:02 +0100, Andrea Zanni zanni.andre...@gmail.com wrote: About this: On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 2:13 PM, David Cuenca dacu...@gmail.com wrote: Connecting new uploaded books with Wikidata: again this is very related to the above. As a first preparatory step, one GsoC of