> I would very strongly recommend to use Semantic MediaWiki for this use
> case. It is more powerful, we use SMW in other WMF contexts already,
Only on wikitech.wikimedia.org, and only until Ryan Lane figures out how
to use Wikidata to manage the labs provisioning/etc :)
> and
> supporting the d
I would very strongly recommend to use Semantic MediaWiki for this use
case. It is more powerful, we use SMW in other WMF contexts already, and
supporting the data inside Meta (instead of inside Wikidata and then
transcluding it) allows us also to generate workflows in Meta involving
local User-acc
Hoi,
I would seriously consider this for two reasons. Yes, we can include this
kind of information, obviously. It is worthwhile information so that is one.
The most important reason why I want to seriously have this information is
because the audience we gain. It is the developers of MediaWiki. Th
Organize MediaWiki's catalog of 1000s of extensions using Wikidata. Is this
a sensible idea? Reality checks and other opinions are welcome here or at
https://bugzilla.wikimedia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46704#c33
Pasting the relevant part for convenience:
Has anybody discussed the possibility of creat
