I think you want it to be Popular print. I changed it for
you.http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q1306119http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popular_print
From: rupert.thur...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 06:29:24 +0100
To: wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: [Wikidata-l] is there a schema for
I would have thought popular print is intended for items which are
one, rather than collections of them?
Three things here:
a) The property Rupert was using was GND entity type, which should
have a very limited set of values - creative work, organisation, etc.
b) For a more general type, use is
Will this information eventually be able to replace the article categorization
system?
From: andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk
Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:21:04 +
To: wikidata-l@lists.wikimedia.org
Subject: Re: [Wikidata-l] is there a schema for the claims of a libraries
collection ?
I would
I think entity type is a property that could be periodically updated
automatically. You just follow the trail of is a relations until you find
loops or dead-ends. Then we know those things are the most abstract or
fundamental types currently in the ontology.
From: hale.michael...@live.com
To:
Many thanks Andrew! How would one define a list of properties which make
sense? Like contents collected from date to date'?
Am 15.03.2013 13:22 schrieb Andrew Gray andrew.g...@dunelm.org.uk:
I would have thought popular print is intended for items which are
one, rather than collections of them?
hi,
i am not even sure if i use the right vocabulary here, but is there
some schema for claims or statements of a libraries collection? i
wanted to add a type, and ended up linking it to collection. the
translation then revealed that it is from horses dressage
