On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Dimitris Kontokostas
wrote:
>
> On Mar 5, 2015 8:50 PM, "Nikolas Everett" wrote:
> > 2. How should we represent the data in the database? BlazeGraph (and
> only BlazeGraph) has an extension that *could* us called RDR. Should we
> use it?
>
> I don't think RDR
On Mar 5, 2015 8:50 PM, "Nikolas Everett" wrote:
>
> TL/DR: We're selected BlazeGraph to back the next Wikidata Query Service.
>
> After Titan evaporated about a month ago we went back to the drawing
board on back ends for a new Wikidata Query Service. We took four weeks
(including a planed trip
On 06.03.2015 15:05, Nikolas Everett wrote:
...
Regarding Markus' points:
...
The obvious question that comes from this point is "why not use
Virtuoso? it is exposed publicly all over the place, you can talk to
the dbpedia folks, they do it" and this is a very compelling argument
As long as
Thanks Magnus! You've been heroic. We'll target getting a version up and
running in labs as soon as we can so people can poke holes in it.
Regarding Markus' points:
BigData == BlazeGraph
---
I agree this is confusing, sorry I didn't mention it. When we started th
Yay progress! :-)
I'll try to keep WDQ alive until you have a production version
up-and-running. Don't take too long...
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:02 AM Markus Krötzsch <
mar...@semantic-mediawiki.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for all the work. I think this is a sensible decision. What
> confused m
Hi,
Thanks for all the work. I think this is a sensible decision. What
confused me at first is that I did not know BlazeGraph (and when you
google for it, the first thing is an unrelated sourceforge project). An
important insight for me thus was that "BlazeGraph" is the project that
has up un
Thanks, Nik for the writeup and thanks so much to you, Stas and
everyone who helped you. It's great to see we're making progress on
such an important piece of Wikidata.
Cheers
Lydia
--
Lydia Pintscher - http://about.me/lydia.pintscher
Product Manager for Wikidata
Wikimedia Deutschland e.V.
Tem
