Nellie,
It will make everybody's work easier if we just make links to the
approriate sites. We may however present a breif "condensed summary"
before we direct a link so that the reader may decide whether she
wants to go ahead or not. Links to Wikipedia sites may be treated as
internal links usin
Hi All,
As late as this comes, i will like to express my sincerest gratitude
to all who voted in the elections, those who encouraged others to
vote, all who put themselves up for the task ahead and to the
wonderful election team of Nellie, Ruvani and Patricia who made this
process simple, transpa
I don't think we need a policy for it Nellie, I can see reasons and benefits
for copying large amounts of content over, as well as simply linking to it.
Maybe I missed something in your original expression of what you saw as a
problem in that?
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:25 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
I also agree to the proposal and providing the link of pages mentioned
by Nellie. The link is
http://www.wikieducator.org/Handbook_of_Open_Universities.
These pages on Open Universities of the World is a collaborative model
of knowledge resource where professional from concerned institutions
joi
There's the GFDL & CC incompatibility problem.
Bingo, there it is there. A 'good' reason not to copy.
Policy? Or just obey the rules in the GFDL?
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 8:53 PM, Chris Harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's the GFDL & CC incompatibility problem.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2008
There's the GFDL & CC incompatibility problem.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Pankaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I also agree to the proposal and providing the link of pages mentioned
> by Nellie. The link is
> http://www.wikieducator.org/Handbook_of_Open_Universities.
>
> These pages on Ope
I totally agree with you, Victor. However, should there be an agreed
upon policy?
On 9/26/08, vmensah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Nellie,
>
> It will make everybody's work easier if we just make links to the
> approriate sites. We may however present a breif "condensed summary"
> before we dir
Dear Nellie and All,
Being a part of the OU Handbook initiative, I must share my views on
this issue, from where you have got it. The idea of OU Handbook is not
to copy information from Wikipedia. In fact, any copying is bad and
not in academic interest, if nothing new is added at the end. The ide
Thats it... and that is why the information provided on WikiEd needs
to be copy-right free. Usually, the information that is being compiled
on Handbook are not adressing these issues.
Pankaj
Leigh Blackall wrote:
> There's the GFDL & CC incompatibility problem.
>
> Bingo, there it is there. A 'g
A hearty congratulation for the victorious council members. I hope you
all will live up to the expectations of all wiki-Users.
Dilip Barad, Ph.D.
Department of ENglish
Bhavnagar University, Gujaarat
INDIA.
On Sep 20, 5:10 am, nelliemuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Dear WE Members,
>
> As the
If I recall correctly, the fsf has plans to make them compatible. It's
taking a long time though.
Here's some info.
http://blog.jamendo.com/2007/12/01/breaking-news-wikipedia-switches-to-creative-commons/
Chris
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Leigh Blackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> There's t
What a brilliant idea, it must have taken a long time to think that through.
Forgive my sarcasm.
Chris
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Pankaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Thats it... and that is why the information provided on WikiEd needs
> to be copy-right free. Usually, the information th
Dear Wayne, Steve,Leigh, Minhaaj and Randy
your “Community Communique”, Wayne, makes me think a lot.
1) COL has for me been and is still a guarantee, that WE serves the
objective of developing OERs especially for the use in the so called
developing world. I'm grateful to this organization and a
It certainly would be interesting to get similar (or similalry
relevant depending on country) statistics from institutions from
around the world. It would be interesting to have evidence of the
change. Or if the change is regionalized...
http://www.academiccommons.org/commons/essay/it-index
Chee
Hi Peter,
COL has commissioned the development of a robust monitoring and
evaluation plan for WikiEducator to help us measure our progress towards
achieving our strategic objectives.
I'm hoping to post the plan on the wiki next week (one of the top 10
priorities of my to do list ). The plan ha
Good Afternoon,
Here are WikiEducator's latest traffic ranking worldwide: As Alexa
Statistics of Sep 24, WikiEducator has made a big jump from last month
to this month in terms of ranking most popular website:
It is up by 64,024 and currently in 164,234th place from 184,000+ last
month
Re
FYI, the definition should now be updated as per the discussion we've
had here and on the wiki:
http://freedomdefined.org/Definition
HTH,
Erik
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "WikiEducator" group.
To
17 matches
Mail list logo
