Article in the Signpost: [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia
Signpost/2009-01-31/Orphans]]. But in my view calling an article with
two respectable incoming links an orphan is quite misleading.
Charles
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To
2009/2/6 White Cat wikipedia.kawaii.n...@gmail.com:
We are now forced to use US style dates... Thus it is the American
Encyclopedia internationals (non USians) should feel uncomfortable in
visiting let alone editing.
(...)
In the past we had multiple correct ways. For example the use of ISO
In the most literal sense, an article with one parent is not an orphan. Just
remember that a statistician was looking at graphs when she said two or
less. True orphans hav no incoming links. Outgoing links are more desirable
when the topic is jeneral, like Arts or Enjineering.
Charles Matthews
hard coded? This is news to me and news to the Manual of Style.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOSNUM#Full_date_formatting
Perhaps you could provide some evidence to back up this assertion?
Almost all templates these days are designed to have dates entered in
a certain way and for a hint its
You know, there's a letter called G...
--
Alvaro
On 06-02-2009, at 12:17, Jay Litwyn brewh...@edmc.net wrote:
In the most literal sense, an article with one parent is not an
orphan. Just
remember that a statistician was looking at graphs when she said two
or
less. True orphans hav no
