Marc Riddell wrote:
> Carcharoth, I believe the problem we as a community are having with the
> issue of civility is finding a definition of it that everyone can agree
> upon. And, since the very concept of civility is so highly subjective, that
> agreeing upon a firm definition is impossible.
On
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Charles Matthews
wrote:
> What works is this:
Want to focus on one.
> - people show respect for the policy by "staying on the fairway", not
> gaming it at the margins;
This only works if the policy is written sufficiently well to allow
for the existence of a
Carcharoth wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:07 PM, Charles Matthews
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>> What works is this:
>>
>
>
>
> Want to focus on one.
>
>
>> - people show respect for the policy by "staying on the fairway", not
>> gaming it at the margins;
>>
>
> This only works if the po
http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/digital/e3i615140fc749e4798425e1349881c51f3
Of course, at this moment it's a Twitter search on the word "skittles"
instead. Leading to:
http://uk.techcrunch.com/2009/03/02/skittles-the-cause-of-all-world-evil-or-just-clever-marketing/
- d.
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 3:23 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> http://www.adweek.com/aw/content_display/news/digital/e3i615140fc749e4798425e1349881c51f3
>
> Of course, at this moment it's a Twitter search on the word "skittles"
> instead. Leading to:
>
> http://uk.techcrunch.com/2009/03/02/skittles-the-cau
