On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> I must have been away too long, but seriously, guys, what's up with
> this style of posting? "Here's my totally cryptic comment, see if you
> can figure out what the hell I mean!"
>
> Do everyone a favour and give people a bit of context. Thi
http://www.mmm-online.com/Docs-look-to-Wikipedia-for-condition-info-Manhattan-Research/article/131038/
http://www.thehealthcareblog.com/the_health_care_blog/2009/05/beyond-wikipedia.html
Fred
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To u
2009/5/23 Fred Bauder :
> http://www.mmm-online.com/Docs-look-to-Wikipedia-for-condition-info-Manhattan-Research/article/131038/
>
> http://www.thehealthcareblog.com/the_health_care_blog/2009/05/beyond-wikipedia.html
"Nearly 50% of US physicians going online for professional purposes
are visiting
> http://www.mmm-online.com/Docs-look-to-Wikipedia-for-condition-info-Manhattan-Research/article/131038/
>
> http://www.thehealthcareblog.com/the_health_care_blog/2009/05/beyond-wikipedia.html
>
> Fred
The original study:
http://www.manhattanresearch.com/products/Strategic_Advisory/ttp/
Fred
> 2009/5/23 Fred Bauder :
>> http://www.mmm-online.com/Docs-look-to-Wikipedia-for-condition-info-Manhattan-Research/article/131038/
>>
>> http://www.thehealthcareblog.com/the_health_care_blog/2009/05/beyond-wikipedia.html
>
> "Nearly 50% of US physicians going online for professional purposes
> are
2009/5/23 Fred Bauder :
> That is the key, if physicians actively edit and keep the articles
> comprehensive and up to date, there is nothing wrong with them consulting
> them. Other than the usual difficulties...
FlaggedRevs ought to help with some of the usual difficulties if they
get implemente
I suppose this is old news:
http://www.brandweeknrx.com/2007/08/abbott-caught-a.html
Fred
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
2009/5/23 Fred Bauder :
> I suppose this is old news:
>
> http://www.brandweeknrx.com/2007/08/abbott-caught-a.html
"August 30, 2007"
Yeah, I'd say that's old news...
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailin
Thomas Dalton wrote:
> 2009/5/23 Fred Bauder :
>
>> http://www.mmm-online.com/Docs-look-to-Wikipedia-for-condition-info-Manhattan-Research/article/131038/
>>
>> http://www.thehealthcareblog.com/the_health_care_blog/2009/05/beyond-wikipedia.html
>>
>
> "Nearly 50% of US physicians going onli
On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> Hi,
> It is the happy circumstance that:
> a) Articles about pieces of classical music are much better with an
> excerpt of the music presented as an image
> b) PDFs of enormous amounts of classical music are available, in
> public domain,
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 3:19 AM, Oskar Sigvardsson <
oskarsigvards...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 4:03 AM, Steve Bennett
> wrote:
> > I must have been away too long, but seriously, guys, what's up with
> > this style of posting? "Here's my totally cryptic comment, see if you
> > c
I notice that in several survey the information that most physicians
regret Wikipedia not having is information on standard dosage,
information that we have made the policy decision to omit.
I think this a particularly stupid decision. For current drugs, the
information is standardized and availab
In a message dated 5/23/2009 9:02:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
dgoodma...@gmail.com writes:
> information on standard dosage,
> information that we have made the policy decision to omit.
> I think this a particularly stupid decision.>>
---
Would you be willing to post here a di
The guideline is at:
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MOS:MED#Drugs]
"Do not include dose and titration information except when they are
notable or necessary for the discussion in the article. Wikipedia is
not an instruction manual or textbook and should not include
instructions, advice (legal, medic
14 matches
Mail list logo
