As a casual reader on OPB (other people's blogs) I get annoyed if my
comment gets wiped or never appears.
Yeah, but see, the thing is, you don't own the blog. The person
writing it does (well, technically, the blog hosting service does).
They have the right to not have a comment show up.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Emily Monroe bluecalioc...@me.com wrote:
Simple suggestion: A big green button at the bottom of every page
marked Comment on this page which creates a new section on the
discussion page.
Good idea, but we would get dozens of OMG I LUV THIS PERSUN!11!!!.
Simple suggestion: A big green button at the bottom of every page
marked Comment on this page which creates a new section on the
discussion page.
Good idea, but we would get dozens of OMG I LUV THIS PERSUN!11!!!.
Emily
On Sep 2, 2009, at 8:58 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
On Thu, Sep 3,
In a message dated 9/3/2009 7:21:35 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
bluecalioc...@me.com writes:
Yeah, but see, the thing is, you don't own the blog. The person
writing it does (well, technically, the blog hosting service does).
They have the right to not have a comment show up. We could use
In a message dated 9/3/2009 7:24:33 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
majorly.w...@googlemail.com writes:
Or worse, THIS PERSON IS A DIRTY PEDO1!! (or something as bad).
Could
be problematic for BLPs.
--
We already get that. So this wouldn't change that issue.
I suppose there would need to be a guideline started to decide what
sorts of things are OK for comments.
I thought we were talking about how to make the talk page more
accessible...
Emily
On Sep 3, 2009, at 1:19 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 9/3/2009 7:21:35 AM Pacific
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 10:19 AM, FT2ft2.w...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually is there a reason why refs couldn't have a separate section?
People with a view on this may like to contribute to:
http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposal:Move_references_out_of_the_code
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:09 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 8/31/2009 11:47:04 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
ft2.w...@gmail.com writes:
- WikiTrust might be described as a way to see how long an edit
endured
and how much trust it seems to have; in most users' hands it'll
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Bod Notbodbodnot...@gmail.com wrote:
I found a Wikimania presentation earlier that showed colour coding of
text according to trustworthiness and also rated contributors on a
similar scale. I can't seem to find it again now though.
D'oh!
My usually gorgeous
No that was someone's idea, but not mine.
I like having the Make a Comment button at the bottom of each
article, as this would mimic what readers are used to seeing at other
sites.
I don't that this would create a seperate section on the Talk page
however, as I think this would clutter the Talk
I don't see this as a way to improve the article, only a way to
allow casual readers to make comments.
THANK YOU for the clarification!
Emily
On Sep 3, 2009, at 5:04 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
No that was someone's idea, but not mine.
I like having the Make a Comment button at the
2009/9/3 Emily Monroe bluecalioc...@me.com:
I don't see this as a way to improve the article, only a way to
allow casual readers to make comments.
THANK YOU for the clarification!
It is, of course, *also* a good way to get input from people
frightened by the idea of editing for whatever
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:19 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 9/3/2009 7:24:33 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
majorly.w...@googlemail.com writes:
Or worse, THIS PERSON IS A DIRTY PEDO1!! (or something as bad).
Could
be problematic for BLPs.
--
We
I like having the Make a Comment button at the bottom of each
article, as this would mimic what readers are used to seeing at
other sites.
Maybe the Make a Comment button can link to a page that has check
boxes that have both positive (Fun to read, easy to understand,
accurate) and
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:06 AM, David Gerarddger...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Y'know, we have pretty much no facillities *just for the reader*.
I thought they had things called articles they could read? :-)
Seriously, some of the better portals are hard for readers to find.
And I'm not sure how
Bod Notbodbodnot...@gmail.com wrote:
People with a view on this may like to contribute to:
http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposal:Move_references_out_of_the_code
Good link! Note I've proposed a move on the talk page.
-Stevertigo
___
WikiEN-l
16 matches
Mail list logo
