On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Charles Matthews
wrote:
> No, but I can think much better ways of framing the question than
> following up WSJ article would lead to. Studies and articles written by
> people not really aware of how our communities function are not really
> good places to start, if
Philippe Beaudette wrote:
> On Dec 3, 2009, at 4:00 AM, wikien-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
>
>
>> Apparently people should use edit summaries and only use American
>> English. Agree with the first, disagree with the second (Americans
>> asserting ownership on spelling is a negative rath
On Dec 3, 2009, at 4:00 AM, wikien-l-requ...@lists.wikimedia.org wrote:
> Apparently people should use edit summaries and only use American
> English. Agree with the first, disagree with the second (Americans
> asserting ownership on spelling is a negative rather than a positive
> factor); but bo
"stevertigo" wrote in message
news:7c402e010911271703r1285a9a7gb87af201c346c...@mail.gmail.com...
> Bod Notbod wrote:
>> Could change, of course:
>> http://strategy.wikimedia.org/wiki/Editor_awards_and_rewards
>
> Which leads us to the question - is that "peer to peer" logo David
> made open sou
2009/12/3 Charles Matthews :
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/dec/02/wikipedia-known-unknowns-geotagging-knowledge
>
> Mark Graham writes. Map of density by geo-tagging round the world, and a
> sensible comment that broadband is only just coming to parts of Africa,
> meaning we can expec
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/dec/02/wikipedia-known-unknowns-geotagging-knowledge
Mark Graham writes. Map of density by geo-tagging round the world, and a
sensible comment that broadband is only just coming to parts of Africa,
meaning we can expect more editing from there in future.
