10 days is a bit short for preparation, as most people didn't get involved
until a launch date was fixed. It would have been nice if we had had a bit
more time, but we should broadly be ready. It's also not impossible that we
request some configuration changes before or during the trial.
On Wed,
Just for the sake of understanding better for next time, would people
have preferred that we launched later?
We gave a date as soon as we were reasonably confident that we could hit
a date for the minimum feature set, based on the theory that people
wanted this ASAP. But naturally, we could
Just for the sake of understanding better for next time, would people
have preferred that we launched later?
We gave a date as soon as we were reasonably confident that we could hit
a date for the minimum feature set, based on the theory that people
wanted this ASAP. But naturally, we could
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:13 AM, William Pietri will...@scissor.com wrote:
Just for the sake of understanding better for next time, would people
have preferred that we launched later?
We gave a date as soon as we were reasonably confident that we could hit
a date for the minimum feature set,
There was always going to be a bit of Damned if you do, Damned if you
don't; It's just unavoidable in a community this large.
~A
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
As I'm actively involved in the preparation of the trial, I assure 10 days
is short. Most people don't get involved until a launch date is fixed,
especially in this situation where we had to wait for a year with nothing
coming so people just waited for something consistent to get involved. And
now
On 12/06/2010 18:13, William Pietri wrote:
Just for the sake of understanding better for next time, would people
have preferred that we launched later?
We gave a date as soon as we were reasonably confident that we could hit
a date for the minimum feature set, based on the theory that people
On 12 June 2010 22:04, Kwan Ting Chan k...@ktchan.info wrote:
On 12/06/2010 18:13, William Pietri wrote:
Just for the sake of understanding better for next time, would people
have preferred that we launched later?
Personally, just launch the damn thing already!
+1
- d.
On 06/12/2010 01:27 PM, Cenarium sysop wrote:
On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Amory Meltzeramorymelt...@gmail.comwrote:
There was always going to be a bit of Damned if you do, Damned if you
don't; It's just unavoidable in a community this large.
As I'm actively involved in the
On 06/12/2010 02:22 PM, David Gerard wrote:
On 12 June 2010 22:04, Kwan Ting Chank...@ktchan.info wrote:
On 12/06/2010 18:13, William Pietri wrote:
Just for the sake of understanding better for next time, would people
have preferred that we launched later?
Personally,
10 matches
Mail list logo
