The first survey's fine. :-) I'm merely suggesting you put out a second
survey once this one's harvested. The second survey, of course, would
focus more on exploring what we like about anonymity, as you've
indicated you're seeing that unexpected trend.
Sorry for the confusion!
God bless,
Bob
Every now and then something gets nominated for deletion and fans of
it go feral and say "I'm going to start an inclusionist fork! No
notability policy!"
Do we have a list of these anywhere?
- d.
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:44 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> Every now and then something gets nominated for deletion and fans of
> it go feral and say "I'm going to start an inclusionist fork! No
> notability policy!"
>
> Do we have a list of these anywhere?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Alte
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 09:44, David Gerard wrote:
> Every now and then something gets nominated for deletion and fans of
> it go feral and say "I'm going to start an inclusionist fork! No
> notability policy!"
>
> Do we have a list of these anywhere?
>
The ones off the top of my head:
Citizendi
Hi Jeroen, you might also want to look at some of the forks of
Wikipedia such as Citizendium and Conservapedia and see how
"successful" they have been with their policies of restricting IP
editing and even pseudonymous editing.
Also there was some discussion about this on the Strategy project. For
Heather Ford, a former Wikimedia advisory board member and researcher/writer
in South Africa has written an essay, "The Missing Wikipedians" about
systematic bias on English Wikipedia (especially) against new users and
topics pertinent to Africa and other diverse places/people.
As an example, she
