It's about time! Who's eligible to vote?
Bob
On 7/1/2011 3:15 PM, Casey Brown wrote:
> /Please distribute this message widely/
>
> *Call for referendum*: The Wikimedia Foundation, at the direction of
> the Board of Trustees, will be holding a vote to determine whether
> members of the community
/Please distribute this message widely/
*Call for referendum*: The Wikimedia Foundation, at the direction of
the Board of Trustees, will be holding a vote to determine whether
members of the community support the creation and usage of an opt-in
personal image filter, which would allow readers to
Hi folks,
we're collecting some categorized examples of WL in use here, to
better understand how it's being used and what the pitfalls may be.
http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/WikiLove/Stories
So far, we're seeing lots of examples of use exactly in the way it's
intended -- new users thanking each o
Hi all,
Once again the Fundraising team will be testing some banners on the
English Wikipedia today (1st July) for anonymous users only. These
will be up from 17:30-18:30 UTC.
If you're interested, you can see the results from our previous tests
here: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fundraising_20
It's nice, but is there a particular reason it's been implemented as
an Extension? It seems like it would have been much simpler to use a
Gadget (as I believe it was before) then other Wikimedia sites could
pick it up easily without needing developers to make config changes.
Pete / the wub
On 25
> I really dislike it. Socialization should be an implicit function of the
> website software, not an explicit one.
NO SOUP FOR YOU!
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wiki
I really dislike it. Socialization should be an implicit function of the
website software, not an explicit one.
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listin
