I couldn't reach it either.
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 24, 2012, at 12:28 PM, Darrell Lucus wrote:
> No problems here ...
>
> Darrell (HangingCurve/Blueboy96)
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Carcharoth
> To: English Wikipedia
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2012 12:27 PM
>
Personally, I've given up on talk pages. The reason is many of them don't
have actual "talk". I see a blue talk link and go there and all that is there
is a template "this page is part of wiki project xyz". I'd really like it if
that kind of information about a page was somewhere other than "t
If you look at the history on the page, you can see the edits and the editors.
You can navigate to the editors talk page and post a message for them there.
Angela
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 16, 2011, at 21:32, Peng Yu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some questions regarding a wiki page, so I want to
What really bothers me about it is that there is no direct link to the
revision history. The authors aren't attributed unless you go to the linked
WP page, and there is nothing that even hints at that.
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.or
Are they looking to make sure they are poised to compete with Wolfram Alpha?
Angela
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Nathan wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8047076.stm
>
> Options include "Google Squared" which mines for identifiable and related
> facts and presents them in a spr
It does make you wonder... with the extra responsibility associated with
having an admin account, there should be some expectation of a certain level
of activity. There are certainly guidelines for the amount of activity that
should have occured before an RFA, so why aren't there any for an expecte
I didn't want to seem rude my asking what the point was, but I agree - I
don't understand the point you were trying to make. If I had to make a
guess, I assume you are in some sort of disagreement on that talk page - I
haven't visited it - about what is and isn't encyclopedic and came here
attempti
I guess that's the difference of someone actually wanting your content or
not...
Angela
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 2:45 PM, James Farrar wrote:
> Well, in relative terms, anyway:
>
>
> http://www.conservatives.com/News/Speeches/2009/04/The_age_of_austerity_speech_to_the_2009_Spring_Forum.aspx
>
> h
So, what happens when this site starts profiting off material they lifted
from Wikipedia without crediting the original authors and conforming to the
GFDL (or whatever license that Wikipedia winds up with?)
Angela
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Jay Litwyn wrote:
> It looks like Portuguese com
OMG, I actually edited the Pokemon article after the weekend. I feel so..
.dirty ;-)
Angela
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM, FT2 wrote:
> It seems they spotted our cunning plan. But never fear - that was intended
> to be discovered all along! The /real/ cabal's secret plan is Windows
> 7which
Until the UK decides to block access again because of some album cover
art. Then what do the teachers do?
Angela
--
Wikipedia:[[User:Psu256]]
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Carcharoth wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Angela Anuszewski
> wrote:
> > Excuse my ignorance, but excatly what is Private Eye?
>
> I looked it up in a handy online encyclopedia...
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_Eye
>
Excuse my ignorance, but excatly what is Private Eye?
Angela
--
Wikipedia:[[User:Psu256]]
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
> It's about time that the US abandoned $1.00 and $2.00 bills and just
> used coins instead.
>
> The risk is to have a situation such as prevails in Egypt. In the two
> weeks that I was there at Wikimania time I only twice received coins in
> change, and thsat was from the cashier at official go
14 matches
Mail list logo
