As has been posted here before, CC is working on version 4.0 of their
licenses--in case you haven't seen it, the public draft is up in
several different formats at
http://wiki.creativecommons.org/4.0_Drafts
Right now their focus is on attribution, and they are asking several
specific questions
Creative Commons is beginning the process of revising their suite of
licenses, with the goal of having a 4.0 version by the end of 2012:
https://creativecommons.org/weblog/entry/30676
They have a set of goals, including better internationalization,
better interoperability with other licenses,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Liam Wyatt liamwy...@gmail.com wrote:
The soundbite I use is that Wikipedia outsources truth. The debate about
what is or isn't true is not ours but is played out amongst the various
sources that we can draw upon as references.
Good soundbite. :-)
-Kat
--
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 6:29 PM, Lunalunasan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 3:07 PM, wjhon...@aol.com wrote:
OK the other side of the argument is Wikipedia is not paper. That
is, presumably, that we have a virtually unlimited amount of space in
which to describe whatever we
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Charles
Matthewscharles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Thomas Dalton wrote:
Well said. That debate was resolved back in the days when we actually
reached consensus occasionally! There are too many people for that to
work, these days. However hard you try, you
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 12:54 PM, David Gerarddger...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/18 Cathy Edwards cathy.edwa...@bbc.co.uk:
I think I have a good idea why BLP are a hot topic of debate in this
area,
It's because they're special, because they can cause (and have
caused) damage to people in a
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:07 PM, David Gerarddger...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/8/18 Kat Walsh mindspill...@gmail.com:
This is about 95% of the truth, actually. Other articles *can* cause
harm in exactly the same way, but are not as obvious or attractive a
target.
Mmm. BLPs became special
Another step towards an open web -- Google's Chrome browser is going
to support Theora video natively with the HTML5 video tag:
http://blog.internetnews.com/skerner/2009/05/google-chrome-3-adds-html5.html
http://codereview.chromium.org/115625/diff/1/2
(Mozilla has already committed to this--and
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Oskar Sigvardsson
oskarsigvards...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:38 AM, Judson Dunn cohes...@sleepyhead.org wrote:
For your comedy pleasure :)
http://xkcd.com/545/
chaos! :)
Ahh, but Black-Hat Man hasn't anticipated our response! We'd delete
