I don't believe a different license is needed. CC licenses can be used
for anonymous works: The author is not given and does not have to be
credited, but everything else (attribution of the work and share-alike)
would stay the same. So a change in the terms of use to the effect of,
"Unregistered edits are considered to have no named author," would be
sufficient.
Kyanos
On 03/27/2015 06:41 AM, WereSpielChequers wrote:
Perhaps we should move to a different licensing model for future IP edits. CC0
for IP edits would be a more sensible license for edits by an IP where in many
cases no-one could attribute the edit to the individual who made it. If people
don't want to release their edits as CC0 they can always create an account.
Regards
Jonathan Cardy
On 27 Mar 2015, at 10:28, Elias Friedman <elipo...@gmail.com> wrote:
It's actually required so as to provide attribution as per the Creative
Commons and other licenses we operate under.
Sent from my Droid 4
Elias Friedman A.S., CCEMT-P
אליהו מתתיהו בן צבי
elipo...@gmail.com
"יְהִי אוֹר"
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
