.)
If you're interested, I encourage you to check out Knowino at
http://knowino.org.
Thanks,
Tom.
--
Thomas Larsen
http://basicprogramming.org
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https
, moderation, and
rating.
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
/ per se.
Cheers,
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Oh, and by pending I meant unless events X or Y occur ... :-)
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
, that's my few pence.
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Oh, and just to clarify—by golden meteorites and acts of God, etc. I
meant that pending disastrous events wiping out humanity and thus our
ability to record history, history is certain to exist in 1000 years.
Cheers,
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l
or fair. Personally, I advocate for (a) no
blocks, (b) long-term blocks, or (c) permanent blocks, depending on
the seriousness of the situation.
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list
day,
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
have a secure server up and running soon.
Thanks,
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Hi,
I think it is a Chinese top.
Yes, I think you're right.
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
edit to an article, whether flagged or not.) is
confusing at best, misleading at worst.
Cheers,
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman
, and it might become slightly global, but
it is not yet multilingual and it isn't free.
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
open,
global, and diverse, like Citizendium. Citizendium is too bureaucratic
for my taste, though, while I find Wikipedia too open; hence, I
recently co-founded Epistemia (http://epistemia.org/).
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l
Brittanica financed a study?
I was under the impression the study was done independently *comparing* us
to Brittanica.
Sorry, that was my mistake. I meant the Nature study comparing
Wikipedia to Britannica ...
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing
crackers.
Hackers aren't crackers, and crackers aren't hackers. Hackers build
things, crackers break things.
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org
that it is by any means perfect or that it has no (serious!) flaws. It
simply means there's nothing better available.
Epistemia aims to provide something better.
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from
for the encouragement, and I invite you to join ...
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
approach.
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
of disruptive and malicious people.
Well, Richard Austin and I would like to invite you to check it out
yourself and formulate your own opinions—see http://epistemia.org/.
Best and friendly regards,
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l
aims to maintain scholarly standards—in other words,
professional standards of writing, etc.
I invite you to contribute!
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https
projects, page would be helpful, and I'll start writing one.
Cheers,
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
in Wikipedia's vein, that addresses perceived problems without
doing something too drastic like requiring account approval, will be
interested and willing to check the project out.
That said, I'm very open to other suggestions.
Cheers!
—Thomas Larsen
on topics which aren't particular
popular.
Sure, but civility wasn't on your list.
I guess I, confusingly, grouped it under not responsible :-).
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list
for society in
both the long and the short term. As I live in Australia, I'd now I'd
like to see Linux being used widely by the Australian Government and
in schools across the country ...
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
or at least freely accessible--that will
benefit both experts, amateurs, and indeed all the public.
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
that prompted the IWF ban?
I hope that we can engage in polite, reasoned intellectual debate
rather than hinging on ILIKEIT/IDONTLIKEIT bigotry.
Cheers and best regards,
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe
to be an encyclopedia, and thus
claim to abide by all the relevant scholary content standards, it'd be
welcomed, I think, in academia.
Cheers,
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https
would, perhaps?
What's needed is a really clear explanation which does not use arcane
words such as flagging or sighting.
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https
or not such an image is appropriate for an encyclopedia such
as Wikipedia claims to be, and whether or not including it is in
accordance with established standards of content scholarship.
—Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l
looked at the image myself, and have no intention of
doing so, as I noted in my post. Isn't it possible to just describe
the picture textually, without actually showing it? More importantly,
is showing the image actually scholarly? My main argument against
inclusion is that it isn't.
—Thomas Larsen
. These people might object to having their knowledge placed
on Wikipedia to be torn apart and/or built up by the ignorant masses
(no offense intended).
The idea might work, but I'm willing to step out and say that I don't
think it will.
On the other hand, I might be pleasantly wrong :-).
--Thomas
Hi,
So, if I read this correctly, anybody wanting to get an article
published in this particular journal will need to write an article for
Wikipedia first?
That's one of the worst ideas I've ever heard.
Personally, I object to writing any full-blown article on Wikipedia
from conscientious
Or *not*.
{{fact}}
Repetition only makes something a fact in church.
Sorry, I don't understand your point here.
Are you denying that libel can seriously hurt real people? Or that
Wikipedia suffers from libel? Or that Wikipedia fails to act
effectively enough against libel?
Repetition only
Or *not*.
{{fact}}
Repetition only makes something a fact in church.
Sorry, I don't understand your point here.
Are you denying that libel can seriously hurt real people? Or that
Wikipedia suffers from libel? Or that Wikipedia fails to act
effectively enough against libel?
Repetition only
are correct than on actually being reliable.
That's my opinion, anyway ...
--Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
vandalism that would be common from a
two-year-old.
And what he's doing is illegal, too. He's taking a huge risk.
Why can't some people simply apologise and move on, or at least move
on? There are other things that are far more worthy of one's time,
Wikipedia-related and not.
--Thomas Larsen
someone to become more knowledgeable and to produce
better scholarship.
Perhaps there's an underlying issue that needs to be solved here.
--Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list
in writing articles. If that's the
case, then my syntax would correct this problem that you, Matthew,
mention: instead of being identified only by a number, references
would be identified by a unique textual ID.
Cheers,
--Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing
==
reference id=smithDavid Smith. ''History of Wednesdays.'' History
Magazine, 2019./reference
This makes the raw wikitext easier to read, since the text of the
actual reference is in the _references_ section instead of in the
page's primary content.
I think this could work ...
--Thomas
everybody for your thoughts.
--Thomas Larsen
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
40 matches
Mail list logo
