On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 7:56 PM, Tony Sidaway tonysida...@gmail.com wrote:
http://daggle.com/closed-unfriendly-world-wikipedia-2853
Now whatever the merits of his case, this chap does have a point about
the unfriendliness of the environment. It isn't so much that we've
gone out of our way to
R.,
Thanks for your note. I've forwarded it, with headings, to the ArbCom.
Hopefully this can get straightened out.
-Will
On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Rick giantsric...@yahoo.com wrote:
If anybody recognizes this email address as coming from me originally
(User:RickK), I would just like
that Charles Matthew has participated in this thread. Could he or
another editor who was present describe the tone of the discussion, and
whether Cirt was mentioned by name?
-Will Beback
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
to verifiably summarizing reliable
sources using the neutral point of view, with due consideration for living
people, we'll stay on the right path.
-Will Beback
___
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list
That's a remarkable achievement. Some might think that the bios of active
politicians would have more problems with accuracy.
-Will Beback
On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Fred Bauder fredb...@fairpoint.netwrote:
Brown found that all of the verifiable biographical information in those
helpful
if a solution could be found.
-Will Beback
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 7:53 AM, Carcharoth carcharot...@googlemail.comwrote:
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Ian Woollard ian.wooll...@gmail.com
wrote:
Basically, what matters here is readability and usefulness.
And knowing how many links
The article doesn't say that a conspiracy within Wikipedia tried to bias
articles. It says that a prominent industrialist and political contributor
paid professional writers to alter Wikipedia articles to change the
descriptions of his involvement in a political movement.
It's a situation where
