Win-win, and community consensus can decide the reliance to place on their
newly written source v. other sources that existed.
FT2
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 8:53 PM, Fred Bauder wrote:
> High motivation for making decent open-source images available:
>
>
> http://searchengineland.com/updating-go
On 12/02/2011, Ken Arromdee wrote:
> The article also has this:
>
>>To mitigate this, we wrote an official biography on our client’s site. This
>>biography carried more weight than the online citations used by other Wiki
>>editors.
>
> which sounds like a classic case of having to jump through hoo
It's not clear if they understand Wikipedia's image licensing policy. The
way that article is phrased, it sounds like they are licensing the picture
to Wikipedia.
The article also has this:
To mitigate this, we wrote an official biography on our client’s site. This
biography carried more weig
On 11 February 2011 20:53, Fred Bauder wrote:
> High motivation for making decent open-source images available:
> http://searchengineland.com/updating-google-image-results-for-online-reputation-management-63965
Reminds me of Durova's classic article from 2007:
http://searchengineland.com/the-s
