2009/7/20 Michael Peel :
>> In another thread, Will Johnson (I think) argued that activity levels
>> (new articles, in particular) would continue to decline rapidly in the
>> next few years and that by Christmas we would have fewer than 1000 new
>> articles per day. Looking at the new stats, I'm m
> In another thread, Will Johnson (I think) argued that activity levels
> (new articles, in particular) would continue to decline rapidly in the
> next few years and that by Christmas we would have fewer than 1000 new
> articles per day. Looking at the new stats, I'm more confident that
> en-wiki
00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland,
> Portugal
> Subject: [WikiEN-l] At last, a new stats run for en:wp!
>
> http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaEN.htm
> http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/07/new-statistics-for-the-english-wikipedia/
> http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/07/new-st
Sage Ross wrote:
> To me, the data is really encouraging. Take a look at the charts for
> New Wikipedians vs. Active Wikipedians. We knew before that both of
> those peaked in early 2007. But now it seems that the decline has
> more or less stabilized, and the decline in active Wikipedians was
>
On Sun, Jul 19, 2009 at 2:15 AM, Sage Ross wrote:
>
> To me, the data is really encouraging. Take a look at the charts for
> New Wikipedians vs. Active Wikipedians. We knew before that both of
> those peaked in early 2007. But now it seems that the decline has
> more or less stabilized, and the
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 7:20 AM, Carcharoth wrote:
>
> Cool! I'm too lazy to look. Anything there worth discussing?
>
To me, the data is really encouraging. Take a look at the charts for
New Wikipedians vs. Active Wikipedians. We knew before that both of
those peaked in early 2007. But now it
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 12:23 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> 2009/7/18 Carcharoth :
>> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 9:53 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>
>>> http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaEN.htm
>
>> Cool! I'm too lazy to look. Anything there worth discussing?
>
>
> Look at that URL at least. You'll
2009/7/18 Carcharoth :
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 9:53 AM, David Gerard wrote:
>> http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaEN.htm
> Cool! I'm too lazy to look. Anything there worth discussing?
Look at that URL at least. You'll see the data for our recent
discussion on article numbers laid ou
On Sat, Jul 18, 2009 at 9:53 AM, David Gerard wrote:
> http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaEN.htm
> http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/07/new-statistics-for-the-english-wikipedia/
> http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/07/new-statistics-for-the-english-wikipedia-2/
>
> This means that we don't hav
http://stats.wikimedia.org/EN/TablesWikipediaEN.htm
http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/07/new-statistics-for-the-english-wikipedia/
http://infodisiac.com/blog/2009/07/new-statistics-for-the-english-wikipedia-2/
This means that we don't have to keep telling people numbers from Oct 2006 ...
- d.
___
10 matches
Mail list logo
