On 8 August 2010 21:16, David Gerard wrote:
> Cracked.com is definitely my favourite reuser of Wikipedia content.
>
> http://www.cracked.com/article_18679_5-real-historical-death-stars-complete-with-baffling-flaws.html
>
> Their best and funniest articles are almost completely historically
> accur
Cracked.com is definitely my favourite reuser of Wikipedia content.
http://www.cracked.com/article_18679_5-real-historical-death-stars-complete-with-baffling-flaws.html
Their best and funniest articles are almost completely historically
accurate. Because of us!
- d.
___
