Thomas Dalton wrote:
Sorry, that bit in brackets wasn't meant to be a summary of the
criteria for each class, it was a description of the difference
between the classes. Each has lots of other criteria, but they are
essentially the same for both.
Getting back to one of the main points: I
(Pardon me if I'm doing something wrong regarding the mailing list, I'm a
newbie to posting despite lurking for some time)
David Lindsey wrote:
snip
I would like to think that we can all agree that Professor Wertheim's
critical response is a helpful one, and that adapting the article
Nihiltres wrote:
snip
I strongly believe that showing very prominently the level of review a given
article—or even a given *revision* thereof—has received, and the perceived
level of quality involved, is a good thing. The Wikipedia 1.0 assessment
system (Stub, Start, C, B, A, GA, FA…)
On 27 April 2010 20:50, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Nihiltres wrote:
snip
I strongly believe that showing very prominently the level of review a
given article—or even a given *revision* thereof—has received, and the
perceived level of quality involved, is a good
On 27 April 2010 21:33, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Well, the research I remember says the transition from B to A makes the
most difference to the reader. So I would make that central to any
system: from 5 to 6, say. I have seen perfectly decent articles labelled
Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 27 April 2010 21:33, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Well, the research I remember says the transition from B to A makes the
most difference to the reader. So I would make that central to any
system: from 5 to 6, say. I have seen perfectly
On 27 April 2010 23:14, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Thomas Dalton wrote:
On 27 April 2010 21:33, Charles Matthews
charles.r.matth...@ntlworld.com wrote:
Well, the research I remember says the transition from B to A makes the
most difference to the reader. So I
Nihiltres wrote:
(Pardon me if I'm doing something wrong regarding the mailing list, I'm a
newbie to posting despite lurking for some time)
David Lindsey wrote:
Finally, though this idea failed to gain any real traction on wiki, I would
like to state my support for the idea of adding a
Following some of the responses to my recent article on featured
articleshttp://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2721/2482,
I decided to carry out a single test run of what adding expert feedback to
the featured article process might look like. To this end, I selected
David Lindsey wrote:
snip
Finally, though this idea failed to gain any real traction on wiki, I would
like to state my support for the idea of adding a fifth criterion to
WP:WIAFA: 5. The article, if possible, has been reviewed by an external
subject-matter expert. Even if no such
10 matches
Mail list logo
