Spotted by Mathias on the comcom list: http://customslaw.blogspot.com/2010/06/cit-dumps-on-wikipedia.html
Precis: litigant brings up Wikipedia description, court rejects it because anyone can edit Wikipedia. So pretty much in accordance with our general advice ;-) That said, the litigant asserted that a long-standing Wikipedia definition could itself be taken as evidence of "common usage" ... that's interestingly plausible. I wonder if someone will get a court to accept that when it's relevant. - d. _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
