Re: [WikiEN-l] How to sabotage Wikipedia, for SEO spammers

2008-11-27 Thread Thomas Dalton
Google way overvalues internal linking anyway. Why else would Wikipedia and Investopedia, with their useless three sentence answers, rank so high for searches like http://www.google.com/search?q=debtor+in+possession+financing Domain authority. Lots of people link to Wikipedia from lots of

Re: [WikiEN-l] How to sabotage Wikipedia, for SEO spammers

2008-11-27 Thread Puppy (KillerChihuahua)
Simplest to find that (almost trivially simply) with a db query - I suggest seeing if there is a developer who doesn't mind running one. FT2 wrote: Out of interest, do any edit summaries actually say Trim internal links to reduce overlinking. You can help, see [[WP:Overlinking]]? :) FT2

Re: [WikiEN-l] How to sabotage Wikipedia, for SEO spammers

2008-11-26 Thread geni
2008/11/26 David Gerard [EMAIL PROTECTED]: http://www.bluehatseo.com/how-to-overthrow-a-wikipedia-result/ What an odious person. - d. Standard SEO. The attack line has been talked about for at least a year but so far no dirrect evidence that it works. In theory it should as long as you

Re: [WikiEN-l] How to sabotage Wikipedia, for SEO spammers

2008-11-26 Thread Charlotte Webb
On 11/26/08, Gregory Maxwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If WP is #1 or #2 and your spamvertisment is #4 you can increase your income greatly by getting WP delisted even if you can do nothing to improve the position of your site. Yes, especially if WP has an article which describes your goods or