There is an excellent story on the BBC about this:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16084861
They've really understood our position on these matters. It looks like
David Gerard is responsible for helping them understand, so thank you
David!
___
On 8 December 2011 19:00, Thomas Dalton thomas.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
There is an excellent story on the BBC about this:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16084861
They've really understood our position on these matters. It looks like
David Gerard is responsible for helping them
There's an interesting story leading in the British newspaper the
Independent this morning based on an undercover sting of lobbyists Bell
Pottinger:
Discussing techniques for managing reputations online, Mr Wilson mentioned
a team that could 'sort' Wikipedia.
'We've got all sorts of dark arts,'
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:57, Sam Blacketer sam.blacke...@gmail.com wrote:
What might be better is to stress that any lobbyist seeking to use 'dark
arts' to correct inaccurate or unfair Wikipedia articles, or to add
properly sourced positive information, is best advised to use OTRS and to
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote:
This sounds like a splendid idea. Perhaps we could supplement it by
informing criminals that they can avoid a life of crime by getting an
education and a job, or maybe we could tell politicians to tell the
truth. Or maybe
On 6 December 2011 16:08, Sam Blacketer sam.blacke...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Tom Morris t...@tommorris.org wrote:
This sounds like a splendid idea. Perhaps we could supplement it by
informing criminals that they can avoid a life of crime by getting an
education
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Sam Blacketer sam.blacke...@gmail.com wrote:
There might be some editors who want to start an immediate investigation to
search for the members of this 'team' but I think that would probably be a
waste of time which would put suspicion on a large number of
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Sam Blacketer sam.blacke...@gmail.com
wrote:
There might be some editors who want to start an immediate
investigation to
search for the members of this 'team' but I think that would probably
be a
waste of time which would put suspicion on a large number of
I think its pretty obvious in this case.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Zahra_Ahmed
Does that relate to a known employee or client?
No. The user created the account only to edit Dahabshiil ‎article.
Four of his edits were tagged with references removed.
His point of view
